IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI, J.
J. Venkataramanan – Petitioner
Versus
The Government Of Gujarat & Anr. – Respondents
R/Special Civil Application No. 18748 Of 2023
Decided On : 28-06-2024
Exemption - Language Test - The Gujarat Government Servants (Lower Standard and Higher Standard Gujarati Language Examination) Rules, 1970 - The court interpreted the provisions of the Rules, particularly Rule 4 regarding exemptions for employees over 50, and concluded that the petitioner was not entitled to such exemption due to the specific conditions of his appointment.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged communications regarding the withdrawal of increments and promotions due to non-clearance of the Gujarati Language Test, arguing that the conditions were waived and violated principles of natural justice.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was required to pass the language examination as per the appointment order and relevant rules, and that the exemption claimed under Rule 4 was not applicable to him.
Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to exemption from the Gujarati Language Test and whether the withdrawal of increments and promotions was lawful.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner accepted the conditions of his appointment, including the requirement to pass the language examination, and that the exemption under Rule 4 of the Rules, 1970 did not apply to him.
Result: The petition was dismissed.
ORDER :
(Vaibhavi D. Nanavati, J.) :
1. By way of present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner herein has challenged the impugned communication No.1147/2023, dated 04.08.2023, addressed by the Registrar, City Civil & Sessions Court, Ahmedabad, under the instructions of the learned Principal Judge, whereby the petitioner was informed that the representation made by the petitioner to grant exemption from passing the Gujarati Language Test, has been ordered to be “Filed”.
1.1 The petitioner further challenges the impugned communication No.AC/502/2023, dated 06.10.2023 addressed by the Registrar, City Civil & Sessions Court, Ahmedabad, under the instructions of the learned Principal Judge informing the petitioner that since the petitioner did not clear the Gujarati Language Test, the increments, Higher Grade and Promotion, already granted to the petitioner, shall be withdrawn. It is the case of the petitioner that both the impugned communications are against the principles of law, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and violative of the concerned Rules i.e. The Gujarat Government Servants (Lower Standard and Higher Standard Gujarat Language Examination) Rules, 1970. In view thereof, the present petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
a) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to admit and allow this petition.
b) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus and be pleased to hold that the impugned communications dated 04.08.2023 (Annexure-A) as well as communication dated 06.10.2023 (Annexure-B) holding the same as illegal, against the principles of natural justice, without application and in violation of Articles- 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India and be further pleased to direct the respondent authority to grant exemption to the petitioner from passing the Hindi/Gujarati Language Examination, as per the provisions of proviso to Rule-4 of The Gujarat Government Services (Lower Standard and Higher Standard Examination Gujarati Language Examination) Rules, 1970.
c) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, Your Lordships may be pleased to hold and declare that the action of the respondent authority in asking the petitioner to clear the Hindi/Gujarati Language Examination at this fag end of his career, is absolutely erroneous, illegal, against the settled provisions of law and is nothing but cruelty as has been observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
d) By an appropriate writ, order and/or direction in the nature of mandamus, Your Lordships may be pleased to hold and declare that the respondent No.2 authority has no right to take back the increments, higher-grade, upgradation/ promotion already granted to the petitioner or to keep in abeyance the other retiral benefits of the petitioner.
e) Pending admission, hearing and/or final disposal of this application, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to grant the necessary sanction for preparation of pension papers of the petitioner and be further pleased to refrain from taking back the increments, higher-grade, upgradation/promotion already granted to the petitioner and to provide all other retiral benefits without insisting for production of the certificate in Hindi/Gujarati Language Examination.
f) Such other and further relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem just, fit and expedient be granted in favour of the petitioner.
g) Costs of this petition be provided for to the petitioner.”
2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present petition read thus:
2.1 The respondent No.2 herein published an advertisement bearing Notice No.35/1991, inviting applications for the post of Personal Assistants (English Stenographers, Grade- I) in the pay scale of Rs.2000-3500 plus allowances, on 15.10.1991 wherein, the qualifications prescribed was that th
Gujarat Sachivalaya and Allied Offices Stenographers Association vs. State of Gujarat
The court established that acceptance of appointment conditions, including language proficiency requirements, precludes later claims for exemption based on age.
The court ruled that the Gujarat Civil Services (Conditions of Service relating to Departmental Examination) Rules, 2015 are prospective and do not apply retrospectively to petitioners, who failed to....
The court ruled that the petitioner must comply with the new departmental examination rules for promotion, as the old rules do not apply retrospectively.
The court emphasized that it cannot rewrite the terms of recruitment and cannot issue directions contrary to the eligibility requirements under the applicable terms.
Exemption from departmental examination can be granted retrospectively; discrimination against similarly situated officers violates Article 14.
The requirement to pass the Punjabi language examination is not essential at the application stage but must be fulfilled before appointment, as per Rule 17 of the 1994 Rules.
The requirement of proficiency in Telugu for judicial recruitment is upheld as a valid policy decision, not violating fundamental rights or being arbitrary.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.