IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J.
Avinash Dalmotra – Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & Ors. – Respondents
CWP-28074 of 2022
Decided On : 14-02-2024
JUDGMENT
Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, J. (Oral)
The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to the respondents to permit him to join as Constable in District Police Cadre.
2. The petitioner pursuant to Advertisement No.2/2021 dated 16.07.2021 (Annexure P-1) applied for the post of Constable in District Police and Armed Police Cadre. The minimum education qualification was prescribed in Clause 5.3 of the advertisement. The said Clause of the advertisement reads as:
[Emphasis Supplied]
3. The last date for filing application was 15.08.2021 and written test was conducted on 29.09.2021. The petitioner cleared written test as well as successfully passed through scrutiny of documents which took place on 12.12.2021. The petitioner was found fit in the medical examination. In May' 2022, select list was uploaded on the website of the respondent. The name of the petitioner figured in the select list, however, he has not been issued appointment letter because he, on the date of application, was not possessing matriculation certificate with Punjabi language. The petitioner had applied for examination of Punjabi subject before July' 2021 and exam was to be conducted by Punjab School Education Board in July' 2021. On account of COVID-19, the exam could be conducted on 10.11.2021 and result was declared on 05.04.2022. In this way, the petitioner, on the date of filing application for the advertised post, was not possessing matriculation certificate with Punjabi.
4. The respondent referred the matter to its Law Officer who formed an opinion that in terms of Rule 17 of Punjab Civil Services (General and Common Conditions of Service) Rules, 1994 (for short 1994 Rules'), the petitioner, on the date of filing application for the post of Constable, was supposed to possess certificate of matriculation with Punjabi language. On the basis of said opinion, the Commissioner of Police, Amritsar vide communication dated 28.11.2022 (Annexure R-4) informed the Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot that petitioner was not possessing requisite qualification on the date of application, thus, he is not eligible for appointment. For the ready reference, letter dated 28.11.2022 is reproduced as below:
Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer v. Shikun Ram Firuda
The requirement to pass the Punjabi language examination is not essential at the application stage but must be fulfilled before appointment, as per Rule 17 of the 1994 Rules.
The interpretation of statutory rules and their application in determining eligibility for public employment.
Candidates cannot challenge recruitment criteria after participating in the selection process, as estoppel applies. Eligibility is determined by the employer based on stated qualifications within the....
The court emphasized that it cannot rewrite the terms of recruitment and cannot issue directions contrary to the eligibility requirements under the applicable terms.
Reservation benefit requires application under reserved category with valid certificate; recruitment rules prevail over advertisement on qualifications; non-applicants lack locus to challenge selecti....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the eligibility for recruitment goes to the root of selection, and a person who does not possess the prescribed qualification cannot be app....
The court affirmed that the Postal Department's recognition of the Prathama qualification as equivalent to matriculation validated the appointment of the writ petitioner, emphasizing that qualificati....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.