RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Khirodhar Mahto S/o Late Paran Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The matter has been taken up through Video Conferencing with the consent of learned counsel for the parties. They have no complaint whatsoever regarding audio/visual quality.
I.A. No. 5180 of 2020
2. This application has been filed for condoning the delay of about six months, which has occurred in preferring the present appeal. However, the office has reported that in view of the order dated 23.03.2020 and 06.05.2020 passed in suo-moto Writ Civil No. 03 of 2020 by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the appeal is to be treated to have been filed within time.
3. Ordered accordingly.
4. Thus, there will be no requirement of condoning the delay, because the appeal has to be treated to have filed within time.
5. This Interlocutory Application, accordingly, stands disposed of.
6. However, this order would be subject to any objection raised in future by any of the party or the aggrieved person.
L.P.A. No. 299 of 2020
7. The instant intra-court appeal preferred under Clause-10 of Letters Patent is directed against the order/judgment dated 13.02.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. (S) No. 424 of 2018, by which, the direction sought for by the writ petitioner, upon the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.