A. Y. KOGJE, SAMIR J. DAVE
Prince Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE)
[1] These two criminal appeals are filed for discharge of the appellants in connection with an offense registered vide NIA Case No.RC-26/2021/NIA/DLI which was registered for offense punishable under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 8(c), 21(c), 23(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act and Sections 17, 18 and 22C of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as “UAPA Act” for short).
[2] It is a case of illicit import of heroin camouflaged as a “Semi Processed Talc Stones” from Afghanistan in a huge quantity to the tune of 2988.21 Kgs. with an international value worth Rs.21,000/- Crores. The offense came to light when the DRI, Gandhidham acted on a specific intelligence input received on 13.09.2021 and therefore, DRI, Gandhidham constituted a team to carry out the inspection of the consignment specifically imported in two containers, and upon examination of such goods under the panchnama dated 14.09.2021, contained in 18 jumbo bags in one container and 20 jumbo bags in another container, particularly preliminary testing of goods were conducted by the experts of FSL, Gandhidham, wherein test report confirms
Abdul Kadar Jusab Sandhi vs. State of Gujarat, reported in
Asim Shariff v/s National Investigation Agency, reported in
Babu Vergese v/s. Bar Council of Kerala, reported in
Dipakbhai Jagdishchandra Patel v/s. State of Gujarat, reported in
Ghulam Hassan Beigh v/s. Mohammad Maqbool Margey and others, reported in
Mohammed Khalid v/s. State of Telagana, reported in
Sajjan Kumar v/s. CBI, reported in
State of Karnataka v/s. M.R.Hiremath, reported in
State of Union of India v/s. Mohanlal and Another, reported in
The court ruled that sufficient evidence exists to proceed with trial despite procedural non-compliance under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the need for a strong suspicion to uphold charges.
Mandatory compliance with NDPS Act's provisions for seizure and evidence is essential; failure leads to invalidation of convictions.
Point of Law : Harsher the punishment, more is the strictness of proof required for the prosecution. The burden is always upon prosecution to prove the case against the person accused with proof beyo....
Interim Bail on medical grounds - Indulge in supply of wholesale and retail cocaine - Petitioner's medical condition is concerned; documents on record do no suggest any immediate medical treatment or....
Strict compliance with the statutory provisions of the NDPS Act, particularly in cases involving the seizure and disposal of contraband, is crucial to establish the integrity of the evidence and the ....
The court reaffirmed that non-compliance with procedural safeguards under the NDPS Act, particularly Section 52A, does not automatically entitle an accused to bail; the court must still find reasonab....
Recovery of Ganja – Samples drawn in presence of Magistrate and list thereof on being certified alone would constitute primary evidence for the purposes of trial.
The conviction was quashed due to failure to comply with mandatory procedures for evidence collection under the NDPS Act, emphasizing the importance of a fair trial.
Strict adherence to procedural safeguards in narcotics cases is essential; failure to comply can lead to acquittal.
The conviction under the NDPS Act was quashed due to failure to comply with mandatory procedures for sample collection, emphasizing the importance of due process in narcotics cases.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.