SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 43

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO, J
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
VITTHALBHAI PUNJABHAI VANKAR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2) ,Respondent Advocate: MR. HARDIK K RAVAL(6366)

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant – State under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) against the judgment and the order dated 30.01.2006 in Sessions Case No.11 of 2015 (Old Sessions Case No.36 of 2014) passed by the learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge, District Vadodara at Savli (hereinafter referred to as ‘the learned Trial Court’), whereby, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the respondents – accused from the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 306 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as ‘the IPC’). The respondents are hereinafter referred to as ‘the accused’ as they stood in the rank and file in the original case, for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.

2. The relevant facts leading to filing of the present appeal are as under:

2.1. That deceased Salraben was wife of the accused No.1 Vitthalbhai Punjabhai Vankar and the accused Nos.2 and 3 are the mother-in-law namely Leelaben Punjabhai Vankar and father-in-law namely Punjabhai Somabhai Vankar of deceased Sarlabenben. The accused had physically and mentally tortured the deceased Sarlabenben by demanding dow

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top