SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Hemant M. Prachchhak, J.
State of Gujarat – Appellant
versus
Parvatbhai Navalsinh Rathod – Respondent
R/Criminal Appeal No.799 of 2010
Decided on 7.3.2025

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Public Prosecutor (2),
For the Respondent: Mr. Maulik M Soni (7249)

IMPORTANT POINT
Abetment of suicide – Merely on allegation of harassment without their being any positive action proximate to the time of occurrence on part of accused which led or compelled the person to commit suicide, conviction in terms of Section 306 IPC is not sustainable.

Headnote:

(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 498(A) and 306 read with Section 107 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 378 – Cruelty and abetment of suicide – Appeal against acquittal – Deceased had committed suicide by jumping into well, which was immediately informed to family members of deceased by respondent accused and even at that relevant point of time, no complaint was filed by complainant but, same was filed after almost 17 days after consultation with family members – There are all likelihood that present complaint was an afterthought – In marriage span of four years of deceased and respondent accused, no such allegations of harassment were made by complainant on earlier occasions and no untoward incident had taken place between both families in past – After considering all these aspects, trial court was justified in passing impugned judgment and order – When two views are possible and if trial court has adopted view which is in favour of accused under normal circumstances, it may not be disturbed by appellate court while exercising jurisdiction under Section 378 of Cr.P.C. – Judgment and order of acquittal hereby confirmed. (Paras 6.1, 6.2 and 7)

(B) Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 306 – Abetment of suicide – Merely on allegation of harassment without their being any positive action proximate to the time of occurrence on part of accused which led or compelled the person to commit suicide, conviction in terms of Section 306 IPC is not sustainable – Ingredients to constitute an offence under Section 306 of IPC (abetment of suicide) would stand fulfilled if suicide is committed by deceased due to direct and alarming encouragement / incitement by accused leaving no option but to commit suicide – In cases of abetment of suicide by and large facts make things clear more particularly from nature of allegations itself – Courts should know how to apply correct principles of law governing abetment of suicide to facts on record – It is inability on part of courts to understand and apply correct principles of law to cases of abetment of suicide, which leads to unnecessary prosecutions. (Paras 6.6 and 6.7)

Result: Acquittal Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT

The present appeal is filed by the appellant – State of Gujarat (original complainant) under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “Cr.P.C.”) against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 05/11/2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Dahod (hereinafter referred to as “the trial court”) in Sessions Case No.42 of 2009, whereby, the learned Trial Judge has acquitted the original accused respondent herein for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A) and306 of the Indian Penal Code (for short “the IPC”).

2. The brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are as under:

2.1 On 21/12/2008, the complainant namely, Shakarabhai Madubhai Sangod, resident of Amlimenpur, Ta.Dhanpur had dictated the facts of the complaint before PSI, Garbada that he has four daughters and one son. Out of them, marriage of his daughter namely, Champaben was done before around four years with Pavansinh Navalsinh Rathod of village Dadur. On 01/12/2008, younger brother of husband of his daughter namely, Kanubhai Navalsinh and Mandor Rameshbhai Badubhai from village Dadur came to his house at around 4.00 p.m. in the evening and inquired as to whether Champa visited his place or not. He replied that she had not visited his place. On being asked as to from when the said Champa is not present at his place, he replied that since she left from yesterday morning without informing anyone. Thereafter, on 04/12/2008, two persons came from village Dadur at around 10.00 a.m. in the morning and informed to him that his daughter namely, Champaben is found dead in Panchayat well of village Dadur. Therefore, persons from his village namely, Makansing Mansukhbhai and Narvatbhai Kalubhai and Fatesing Manabhai, etc. and the ladies reached at village Dadur and saw that dead body of his daughter namely, Champaben was lying in the well adjacent to the road. On removing her dead body, it appeared her skin was corrugated and no injury marks appeared on it. Thereafter, the said dead body was sent to the hospital for post-mortem. It is the case of the informant that the daughter of the informant namely, Champaben and son-in- law namely, Parvatsinh and his mother namely, Babaliben and younger brother of her husband namely, Kanubhai were residing jointly in same residence. As Champaben did not have any child, on being displeased, she had returned to her maternal place for around thrice. As son-in-law came to pick her up, they gathered people as Panchas, persuaded her and sent her to her in laws’ place. Once his daughter came to his house on being displeased and she stayed there for around two months, Sarpanch of village Dadur and son in law namely, Parvatsinh and other persons visited there. At that time, upon gathering the people of the village, on reprimanding son-in-law, his daughter was persuaded and sent to her in laws’ place. On last Diwali, when brother of the complainant namely, Kalubhai had gone and brought his daughter, she informed that her husband was taunting her as she was unable to conceive a child. He demands to solemnize second marriage with another lady and thereby quarrels with her. Thereafter, as his son-in-law namely, Parvatsinh came to pick her up, he was reprimanded and told not to quarrel with his daughter. Thereafter, before around ten days of the said incident, his son-in-law namely, Parvatsinh came alone to his place and told him that now onwards neither himself nor his daughter shall visit his place and he left from there. Thereafter, dead body of his said daughter was found from panchayat well of village Dadur. Therefore, as son-in-law namely, Parvatsinh was causing mental harassment to his daughter for the reason of not able to conceive a child, demanded that he would solemnize second marriage and quarreling, the daughter of the complainant namely, Champaben on being fed up of such harassment, jumped in the well and died. As the said complaint came to be lodged by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top