IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BIREN VAISHNAV, NISHA M. THAKORE, JJ.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rinaben Dipeshbhai Sompura (Trivedi) and Others – Respondents
First Appeal Nos. 3906, 3907 of 2019, Cross Objection Nos. 13, 229 of 2022
Decided On : 26-04-2024
JUDGMENT :
NISHA M. THAKORE, J.
1. All these matters are connected with each other in a way that First Appeal No. 3906 of 2019 and First Appeal No. 3907 of 2019, relate to the same accident. This Court vide order dated 04.09.2019 while admitting the First Appeal No. 3906 of 2019, had directed to hear both these appeals together with Cross-Objections filed by the original claimants in respective appeals which were also directed to be heard with main First Appeal.
2. Learned advocate Mr. Chirayu Mehta had appeared for the Appellant Insurance company. Learned advocate Mr. N.V. Gandhi had entered appearance in First Appeal No. 3906 of 2019, for heirs and legal representatives of the deceased owner joined as respondent no. 1-original claimant of MACP No. 940 of 2011 of the vehicle. Learned advocate Mr. Bharat B. Shah has entered his appearance on behalf of respondent no. 1 in First Appeal No. 3907 of 2019 i.e. original claimant of MACP No. 634 of 2015 (old MACP Case No. 52 of 2011). Learned advocate Mr. Tanmay Karia has appeared on behalf of respondent no. 2 Insurance company of the offending vehicle Tanker. The cross objections have been filed by respective claimants seeking enhancement of award amount. All these matters were heard together and were reserved for orders. The matters are thus disposed of by this common order.
FIRST APPEAL No. 3906 of 2019:
3. The present appeal is filed at the instance of the Insurance Co., original opponent No. 3, challenging the judgment and order dated 24.04.2019 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi), Ahmedabad Rural at Mirzapur, in MACP No. 940 of 2011. By the said judgment and award, the learned Judge has been pleased to allow the claim petition preferred by the heirs of the deceased Dipeshbhai Dilipbhai Sompura, who succumbed to the fatal injuries in the motor accident. Learned Judge held the opponents jointly and severally liable to pay an amount of Rs. 31,55,533/- to the original claimants with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of incident till actual realization.
CROSS-OBJECTION NO. 229 OF 2022:
4. The original claimant - the widow of the deceased has preferred Cross-Objection seeking enhancement of award amount for a sum of Rs. 34,88,467/- as against the award amount of Rs. 31,55,533/- with interest @ 9% from the date of claim petition till its actual realization. The original claimant has also disputed 20% contributory negligence of the driver of the vehicle owned by heirs in order to determine just and proper compensation.
FIRST APPEAL NO. 3907 OF 2019:
5. The present appeal is filed at the instance of Insurance Company i.e. original opponent No. 2 challenging the judgment and award dated 01.05.2019 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.) Ahmedabad Rural at Mirzapur, in MACP No. 634 of 2015. By the said judgment and award, the learned Judge has been pleased to partly allowed the petition of the injured claimant driver holding the opponents liable to pay an amount of Rs. 4,08,600/- to the original claimant with interest @ 9% from the date of the claim petition till its actual realization.
CROSS-OBJECTION NO. 13 OF 2022:
6. In respect of the aforesaid award, the injured claimant has submitted Cross-Objection seeking enhancement of additional award amount of Rs. 5 Lakhs.
7. FACTS OF THE CASE:
In nutshell, the occurrence of the accident as submitted by the injured claimant before the Tribunal is reproduced hereunder:
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur and Others
Abdulmiya Jafarali Saiyed vs. Sukhvindersing Harbansing
Bijoykumar Dugar vs. Bidya Dutaa
Jakir Hussain vs. Sabir and Others
Malarvizhi and Others vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Others
National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and Others
Nishansinh and Others vs. Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Reshma Kumari and Others vs. Madan Mohan and Another
Sarla Verma and Others vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another
The court affirmed the principle of just compensation in motor accident claims, emphasizing the need for adequate assessment of loss of dependency and future prospects based on established income.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of compensation in motor accident cases, considering factors such as the deceased's income, personal expenses, and future prospec....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of principles of fairness, reasonableness, and equitability in determining just and proper compensation in motor vehicle accident c....
The court established that future prospects must be considered in compensation calculations, clarifying that a disability rating directly affects compensation awarded.
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is a beneficial legislation which has been framed with object of providing relief to victims, or their families, in cases of genuine claims.
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the standardization of addition to income for future prospects and the need for uniformity and consistency in determining compensation in motor....
The judgment establishes that compensation for personal injury must reflect actual income, future prospects, and the extent of disability, ensuring just compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
The court ruled that future earning potential must be considered when assessing compensation for injured claimants, particularly students, and emphasized the need for adequate compensation for pain a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.