SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 1870

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A.S. SUPEHIA, GITA GOPI, J.
Patel Umeshkumar Gokalbhai & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State Of Gujarat & Ors. – Respondents
R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1774 of 2024, In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 25743 of 2022 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2024 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1775 of 2024, In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2214 of 2023, R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1776 of 2024 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 25642 of 2022 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2024, In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 25642 of 2022 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 25077 of 2022 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2024 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1778 of 2024 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 25746 of 2022 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2024 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1778 of 2024, R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1779 of 2024 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 25532 of 2022 JUDGMENT DATED: 19/12/2024 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2024 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1780 of 2024 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 575 of 2024 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2024 In R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1780 of 2024 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 575 of 2024 With R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1781 of 2024 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14657 of 2023 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2024
Decided on : 19-12-2024

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :MR BM MANGUKIYA, ADVOCATE for MS BELA A PRAJAPATI, ADVOCATE
For the Respondent:MR SAHIL B. TRIVEDI, MS VIDHI J BHATT, MR DHARMESH DEVNANI, & MR U M SHASTRI, ADVOCATES

IMPORTANT POINT
Only teachers affected by district bifurcation are entitled to transfer benefits under the applicable policy; those remaining in their original districts have no vested rights.

Headnote:

(A) Government Resolution dated 01.04.2022 - Teacher Transfers - The appellants, teachers in Panchmahals District, challenged the cancellation of transfer camps under the said policy, claiming discrimination. The learned Single Judge dismissed their petitions, interpreting the policy correctly. (Paras 4, 12, 16.4, 18.6)

(B) Policy Interpretation - The court ruled that only teachers affected by district bifurcation are entitled to seek transfer under the policy. The appellants, remaining in their original districts, have no vested right to transfer. (Paras 12, 20)

Facts of the case:

The appellants sought to challenge the cancellation of transfer camps for teachers following the formation of Mahisagar District, arguing their rights under the policy. They claimed that the policy was misinterpreted by the authorities.

Findings of Court:

The learned Single Judge's decision was upheld, confirming that the appellants were not entitled to the benefits of the transfer policy due to their unchanged positions.

Issues: Whether the appellants have a right to transfer under the policy despite not being affected by district bifurcation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the transfer policy benefits only those teachers directly impacted by district changes, and the appellants do not qualify.

Result: Appeals dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA)

1. Since extreme urgency is cited before us by the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the appellants, the present group of matters is taken up for final hearing today and after hearing the learned advocates appearing for all the respective parties at length, we are passing the following judgment and order.

2. ADMIT. Learned advocates appear and waive service of notice of admission on behalf of the respective respondents.

3. The present group of appeals filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, 1865, are directed against the common judgment and order dated 04.12.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in the group of petitions. The learned Single Judge has been pleased to dismiss all the writ petitions. With consent, the Letters Patent Appeal No.1779 of 2024 is taken up as a lead matter.

4. The appellants are serving as Teachers at Panchmahals District. Their entire case hinges on the Government Resolution/Policy of the State Government, dated 01.04.2022, more particularly Chapter-Q of such policy, which deals with the transfer of the teachers after bifurcation of the Districts. All the appellants are working in Panchmahals District and prior to their dates of transfer, which were affected between the year 2004 to 2015, they were all working in other Districts. Some of the appellants have been transferred in Panchmahals District in view of the policy of the State Government introduced for the benefits of the couples on their request. In the writ petitions, the appellants-petitioners had prayed for quashing and setting aside the communication dated 1/3.11.2022 issued by the respondent No.2 i.e. Director of Primary Education cancelling the district bifurcation camp in district Panchmahals and Kheda to district Mahisagar. They have also prayed for a direction to organize the district bifurcation camp as per Chapter Q of the Policy/Government Resolution dated 1.4.2022 issued by the Education Department of the State of Gujarat before organizing Inter/Intra District Transfer Camp.

5. Learned advocate Mr.Mangukiya, appearing for the appellants has invited attention of this Court to the Chapter-Q of the Policy dated 01.04.2022 and has submitted that the respondent-State authorities have discriminated the present appellants, who are serving at Panchmahals District by passing the order dated 01/03.11.2022, by which the camps seeking transfer on the formation of the new district Mahisagar were cancelled. He has submitted that the Chapter-Q of the said policy has been misread by the learned Single Judge as well as the authorities and the same does not in any manner stipulates that the teachers, who are working in those talukas, who are not affected by formation of the district, cannot be transferred or the option cannot be offered to them seeking benefit of such transfer. He has referred to the other clauses of the said policy. While referring to the said policy, more particularly paragraph No.10, which pertains for giving an option of inter-district transfer as well as paragraph Nos.5 and 6, which extend the benefit to the couple-teachers, who wish to be transferred at the places of their talukas, it is submitted by him that by impugned decision, they would lose such benefit permanently for getting themselves transferred in the other district. It is also submitted by learned advocate Mr.Mangukiya that the State Government cannot contend contrary to its policy. It is also submitted that in fact, the policy does not in any manner envisages that in cases of bifurcation or formation of district, the seniority of respective teachers are required to be considered, since no criterion has been specified in the policy. He has also referred to the communication dated 01.11.2022 issued by the Joint Director of Gujarat State, Gandhinagar and has submitted that the communication specifically refers to the option of transfer to be extended to the teachers like the present appellants in view of t

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top