SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 1886

SANDEEP N. BHATT
Dilip Manchhalal Parihar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : O I Pathan
For the Respondent: Mr. Manan Maheta, APP.

JUDGMENT :

1. The present petition is filed for the following prayers:

    “a) Be pleased your Lordships to quashed and set aside the complaint (F.I.R) bearing I.CR.No. 11191011240307/2024 registered with DCB Police Station At AHMEDABAD, filed by respondent no.2 qua present petitioner and further be pleased to quashed and set aside the Criminal proceedings qua present petitioner if any arising out of the said complaint.

    (b) That pending hearing and final disposal of this present petition, this Honble Court may be pleased to stay further proceedings of FIR bearing No. 11191011240307/2024 registered with DCB Police Station, AHMEDABAD against the petitioner.

    (c) Be pleased your Lordships to pass any other and further order considering the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice.”

2. Heard learned Senior Counsel Mr. Aditya Bharat Manubarwala with learned advocate Mr. O.I.Pathan for the petitioner and learned APP, Mr. Manan Maheta for the respondent – State.

3. Learned Senior Counsel has submitted that essentially the dispute is between two brothers and initially, the application was given before some other Police Station, though, both the brothers are residing at Mumbai ho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top