M. R. MENGDEY
SHAHIN NOBLE PILLI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.R. MENGDEY, J.
1. The applicant has filed the present application under Section 438 and 442 of the BNSS against the order dated 17.8.2024 passed by learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Designated Court, Rajkot in an application below Exh.26 in Sessions as GPID Case No. 17 of 2023, whereby the application filed by the applicant seeking discharge from the case came to be dismissed.
2. The facts and circumstances giving rise to the filing of the application are such that the FIR being I-C.R. No. 4/2019 came to be registered at CID Crime (Crime), Rajkot Zone, against the present applicant and the other co-accused for the offences punishable under the provisions of IPC and GPID Act. After the conclusion of the investigation, the investigating agency had filed charge-sheet against the accused persons before learned Special Court. The applicant herein thereafter had preferred an application below Exh.26 in Sessions (GPID) Case No. 17 of 2023 which came to be dismissed by learned Special Court, Rajkot vide impugned order. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the same, the applicant had preferred the present application.
3. Heard learned advocate Mr. N.M. Kapadia appeari
Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Internet and Mobile Association of India v. Reserve Bank of India
Rukmini Narvekar v. Vijaya Satardekar and Ors. (2008) 14 SCC 1
Satish Mehra v. Delhi Administration and Anr. (1996) 9 SCC 766
Suresh Budharmal Kalani v. State of Maharashtra
Union of India v. Prafulla Kumar Samal
The court confirmed that sufficient evidence exists to prosecute the applicant for financial fraud related to cryptocurrency investments, emphasizing the limited scope for reviewing interlocutory ord....
The court upheld that under Section 45 of the PML Act, the applicant failed to demonstrate that there were reasonable grounds for believing he was not guilty and unlikely to commit further offenses w....
The court emphasized that economic offenses, particularly fraud affecting multiple investors, warrant serious caution in granting bail due to the potential for evidence tampering and the applicant's ....
Active involvement in an economic offence, including planning, deliberate design, and siphoning off a huge amount of money from investors, can lead to rejection of bail applications.
The court emphasized the stricter conditions for bail under PMLA, reaffirming that prior denials remained effective unless significant changes in circumstances are demonstrated.
Cryptocurrency is not classified as 'money' under the PCMCS Act, and investments in cryptocurrency do not qualify as 'deposits' under the OPID Act, thus negating the applicability of the alleged fina....
The court granted bail under the PMLA, emphasizing the lack of sufficient evidence linking the applicant to money laundering, and highlighting the necessity for a predicate offence to substantiate ch....
Bail – Jurisdiction to grant bail has to be exercised cautiously on the basis of well settled principles having regard to facts and circumstances of each case.
A discharge petition requires sufficient prima facie evidence; an absence in FIR or co-accused acquittals alone cannot substantiate discharge claims.
Conspiracy consists in the agreement of two or more persons to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means. It is an indictable offence at common law. The essence of the offence of co....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.