BIREN VAISHNAV, MAULIK J. SHELAT
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Jagdish Vasava – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Maulik J. Shelat, J.)
1. The present Acquittal Appeal has been filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 24.05.2000 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Vadodara in Session Case No.166 of 1999. The State is in appeal before us. By way of the impugned judgment and order, the accused have been acquitted of all the charges levelled against them under Section 376 read with Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
2. The short facts of the prosecution case are as under:-
2.1 The prosecution alleges that the victim and her friend were walking to attend wedding at night. As she lagged behind her friends by about 10 feet. At that time, three men from behind gagged her by putting hand on her mouth and dragged her into the darkness and then gang-raped her. Unable to seek help, she returned home and told her mother. Her mother reported the incident to a police officer at the wedding venue, but he dismissed her concerns. Later, when the victim's mother and brother confronted the accused's family, they were met with hostility and threats. The accused's family members even assaulted the victim's brother and thre
Babu Sahebagouda Rudragoudar and Others vs. State of Karnataka
The appellate court upheld the acquittal of the accused due to significant contradictions in the victim's testimony and absence of supporting medical evidence, reinforcing the presumption of innocenc....
The prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt, including establishing the victim's age and non-consent; failure to do so justifies acquittal.
The importance of corroborating the evidence of the prosecutrix with scientific evidence in cases of rape, and the presumption of innocence in favour of the accused in acquittal appeals.
The appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and the trial court's findings unless there is a clear error or misreading of evidence.
The appellate court upheld the acquittal, emphasizing that the presumption of innocence remains unless clear evidence of guilt is established, and it should not interfere with the trial court's findi....
An appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and can only overturn an acquittal if the trial court's reasoning is perverse or unsupported by the evidence.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the necessity of compelling evidence to overturn such judgments.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; acquittal should not be disturbed unless clear error or perversity is shown.
Acquittal of accused upheld as prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for compelling evidence to overturn acquittals.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal due to insufficient evidence, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the principle that two reasonable views should not disturb the trial ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.