BIREN VAISHNAV, MAULIK J. SHELAT
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Manharbhai Bhupendrabhai Bariya – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MAULIK SHELAT, J.
1. The present Acquittal Appeal has been filed under Section 378 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and order dated 04.01.2003 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Panchmahals at Godhra in Session Case No.244 of 2002. The State is in appeal before us challenging the impugned judgment and order, by which the respondent – accused has been acquitted from all the charges levelled against him under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act.
2. The short facts of the prosecution case are as under;
2.1 The prosecution case in brief is that on 24.5.2002 at 4 O'clock or thereabout, the accused of this case sprinkled acid on the deceased Gautambhai and his daughter aged about 7 years, who were sleeping in the Dhaliya near their house and thereby caused their death. The motive of the offence was that the accused was having illicit relation with Sumitraben, wife of the deceased, for the last 4 years and the deceased Gautambhai and Dakshaben being an obstacle for the aforesaid illicit relation, the accused caused the death of both of them.As the possession of acid is against the Notification of
Babu Sahebagouda Rudragoudar and Others vs. State of Karnataka
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; acquittal should not be disturbed unless clear error or perversity is shown.
The appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and the trial court's findings unless there is a clear error or misreading of evidence.
The appellate court upheld the acquittal of the accused due to significant contradictions in the victim's testimony and absence of supporting medical evidence, reinforcing the presumption of innocenc....
The appellate court upheld the acquittal of the accused due to insufficient evidence and contradictions in witness testimonies, reinforcing the presumption of innocence.
The acquittal of accused in a murder case was upheld as the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, highlighting the importance of credible evidence in criminal proceedings.
The appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and the trial court's findings unless there is a clear error or perverse conclusion in acquittal cases.
Acquittal of accused upheld as prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for compelling evidence to overturn acquittals.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the necessity of compelling evidence to overturn such judgments.
An appellate court must respect acquittals and only intervene if the trial court's judgment is legally erroneous or misinterprets evidence, maintaining the presumption of innocence.
The prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt, including establishing the victim's age and non-consent; failure to do so justifies acquittal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.