IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
MAUNA M. BHATT, J.
Shri Atul Kantilal Mehta & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The Municipal Commissioner & Anr. – Respondents
R/Special Civil Application No. 16992 Of 2024
Decided On : 18-12-2024
(A) Gujarat Regularization of Unauthorized Development Act, 2022 - Section 5 - Gujarat Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Section 260 - Petitioners sought to stay demolition of unauthorized construction pending regularization application - Court held that notice for demolition is valid as prior applications for regularization were rejected - Action of Corporation found to be legal. (Paras 6.5, 6.8, 8)
(B) Natural Justice - Principles of natural justice must be adhered to in demolition proceedings - Court emphasized the need for proper notice and opportunity to respond before demolition. (Paras 4.4, 6.9)
Facts of the case:
Petitioners are residents of Salman Avenue, challenging demolition notices issued by the AMC for unauthorized construction, claiming pending applications for regularization under GRUDA Act. (Paras 3.1, 3.4)
Findings of Court:
The court found that previous applications for regularization were rejected, thus the demolition notices were upheld. (Paras 6.8, 8)
Issues: Whether the action of the Corporation in issuing demolition notices was valid given pending applications for regularization. (Paras 6.5, 6.8)
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the rejection of prior regularization applications negated the petitioners' claim for protection under Section 5 of the GRUDA Act. (Paras 6.8)
Result: Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
(Mauna M. Bhatt, J.)
1. RULE. Learned Government Pleader Mr. G. H. Virk with learned advocate Mr. S. H. Virk for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
2. This petition is filed with the following prayers:
(b) To issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring that in view of provisions of Sec. 5 of the Gujarat Regularization of Unauthorized Development Act, 2022 when application for regularization has been made under Sec.6 thereof, the notice for demolition issued by respondents remain suspended till the competent authority under the GRUDA Act finally decides the applications (Annexure-W) for regularization made by petitioners for the reasons stated in the memo of petition and in the interest of justice.
(c) Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of the present petition, Your Lordship be pleased to stay the execution, implementation and operation of order/notice dated 23.10.2018 passed by the respondent no. 2 under Sec. 260(2) of the GPMC Act (Annexure-O) and restrain the respondent nos. 1 and 2 from demolishing the building “Salman Avenue” constructed on the land bearing City Survey No. 5459, 5460, 6463 to 5468, Sheet No. 80 Jamalpur-III situated at Astodia Gate Area, Ahmedabad in view of application of regularization of construction made by petitioners under GRUDA Act (Annexure-W) as per Sec.5 of GRUDA Act for the reasons stated in the memo of petition and in the interest of justice.”
3. Pursuant to order dated 13.12.2024, affidavit filed by learned advocate Mr. Bharat Rao dated 16.12.2024 and reply filed by Respondent-Corporation in Civil Application No. 2 of 2024 in Special Civil Application No. 16579 of 2018 is taken on record. The facts in brief as referred in the petition are stated as under:
3.1 The Petitioners herein are owners and occupiers of flats/shops situated in Salman Avenue situated on the land bearing Survey No. 5459, 5460, 6463 to 6468, Jamalpur 3, Near Astodia Gate Area, Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to as ‘subject property’). The said subject property is situated in the area of Dastoor Khan Mosque (at a distance of about 180 meters from the mosque), Near Astodia Gate Area, Ahmedabad. Dastoor Khan Mosque is a protected monument under the provisions of the Ancient Monuments and Archeological Sites and Remains (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1958 (for short ‘the Act, 1958’). It is submitted by the Petitioners that the subject property was developed by Moin Infrastructure LLP - Developer after taking necessary permissions under the provisions of law.
3.2 The details with regard to permissions sought by Developer for development/ construction of subject property is stated here under:
(a) The Developer obtained No Objection Certificate (NOC) for construction of commercial building from Archaeological Survey of India and the competent authority vide communication dated 10.01.2001 (Annexure- A page 30), granted permission, permitting construction of building up to height of 30 meters.
(b) Accordingly, an application with requisite fees was made by the Developer for approval of plan, however, plans were not approved and development permission was not granted.
(c) Since, the Developer could not construct the property, on account of city of Ahmedabad, being affected badly by earthquake of 2001, he made fresh application to Director of Archaeology, Gandhinagar seeking NOC for construction on the land in question. The competent authority vide order dated 10.04.2012 (Annexure-B Page 31), granted permission for construction for 15 meters total height.
(d) Accordingly, the Developer applied on 02.06.2015, to Respondent corporation for commencement certificate (Rajachitthi) for construction. The application dated 02.06.2015, refers to parking + four floor + star cabin + overhead water tank.
(e) The AMC accordingly granted permission dated
The rejection of prior regularization applications under the GRUDA Act negates claims for protection against demolition notices issued by the municipal corporation.
The court determined that unauthorized construction cannot be regularized and emphasized strict compliance with municipal regulations and housing rights, rejecting the claims of the petitioners.
The court affirmed that grievances regarding unauthorised constructions should be addressed under the Gujarat Regularisation of Unauthorised Development Act, 2022, ensuring compliance with legal prov....
Unauthorized constructions cannot be legitimized by time or inaction; strict enforcement of demolition orders is essential to uphold the rule of law.
The court upheld the necessity of fair hearing in administrative decisions regarding construction regularization, mandating compliance with procedural principles under natural justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.