SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 2173

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI, J.
GNANESHWARY D. SHAH – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
Special Civil Application No. 17169 of 2016
Decided On : 03-10-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Respondent: SUMAN J. MOTLA

The cancellation of a senior scale and selection grade after significant delay and without prior communication of adverse remarks violates principles of natural justice.

Headnote:(A) Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Cancellation of senior scale and selection grade - Petitioner challenged the orders dated 15.09.2016 and 07.10.2016, which were passed after 18 years, citing delay and violation of natural justice - The court found that adverse remarks were not communicated to the petitioner, thus quashing the impugned orders. (Paras 4, 12, 14)

(B) Natural Justice - The principle of natural justice mandates that no one should be condemned unheard; the adverse remarks against the petitioner were not communicated, rendering the cancellation of benefits arbitrary. (Paras 6.1, 14)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was appointed as a Lecturer in 1990, regularized in 1993, and granted senior scale and selection grade in 1999 and 2004 respectively. The cancellation of these benefits was based on adverse remarks from 1998-1999, communicated 18 years later.

Findings of Court:
The court quashed the orders cancelling the petitioner’s senior scale and selection grade, directing the authorities to grant all consequential benefits.

Issues: Whether the cancellation of the petitioner’s senior scale and selection grade was justified given the delay and lack of communication regarding adverse remarks.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the cancellation of benefits was arbitrary due to the failure to communicate adverse remarks to the petitioner, violating principles of natural justice.

Result: Petition allowed.

JUDGMENT :

VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI, J.

1. Heard Mr. Gnaneshwary D. Shah, learned party-in-person and Ms. Suman J. Motla, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State.

2. By way of preferring the present Petition, petitioner herein challenges the order dated 15.09.2016 passed by the respondent no. 3, cancelling the senior scale of the petitioner with retrospective effect, from the date of entitlement of senior paygrade, since 22.11.1999. By way of the amendment, petitioner herein has challenged the consequential order dated 07.10.2016 passed by the respondent no. 4, pursuant to the impugned order dated 15.09.2016, wherein, by the said order, the respondent no. 4 has directed the accounts department to reduce the pay of the petitioner, w.e.f. 22.11.1999 and calculate the same, whereby, the respondent no. 4 has removed/demoted the petitioner from in-charge Head of the Department and appointed one Mr. B.J. Panchal, as Head of the Department, with immediate effect, that too, in anticipation, that the respondent no. 2 would pass a similar order in future.

3. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned orders as referred above, the same having been passed after more than 18 years, after the confidential report, is vitiated, on the ground of delay and latches and in view thereof, the same are required to be quashed and set aside.

4. By way of the present Petition, petitioner herein has prayed for the following reliefs:

    “(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in the nature of Certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 15.09.2016 as being arbitrary, illegal, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to provisions of law.

    (A-1) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in the nature of Certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned Orders dated 07.10.2016 [Annexure-A/1(Colly.)] as being arbitrary, illegal, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to provisions of law.

    (B) Pending the hearing and final disposal of this petition, Your Lordships may be pleased to stay the operation and implementation of the impugned order dated 15.09.2016 and direct Respondent Authorities to refrain from undertaking any further steps pursuant to the said impugned order dated 15.09.2016 including any steps towards recovery of any so called dues from the petitioner.

    (B-1) Pending the hearing and final disposal of this petition, Your Lordship may be pleased to stay the operation and implementation of the impugned Orders dated 07.10.2016 [Annexure-A/1(Colly.)] and direct Respondent Authorities to refrain from undertaking any further steps pursuant to the said impugned Orders dated 07.10.2016 including any steps towards recovery of any so called dues from the Petitioner.

    (C) An ex-parte ad-interim relief in terms of prayer (B) may kindly be granted.

    (C-1) An ex-parte ad-interim relief in terms of prayer (B/1) may kindly be granted.

    (D) Your Lordships may be pleased to award the costs of the petition to the petitioner.

    (E) Pass such other and further order or orders as may be thought fit in the interest of justice.”

5.1. Briefly stated that, the undisputed facts are such that, the petitioner herein came to be appointed on ad-hoc basis in the year 1990 on the post of Lecturer in Government Polytechnic College in Plastic department. The services of the petitioner came to be regularized on 22.11.1993. The petitioner came to be granted senior scale of Rs. 1000-325-15200, which came to be approved, w.e.f. 22.11.1999, by order dated 21.11.2003 (Page-49). The petitioner was granted selection grade, which came to be approved and granted to the petitioner, w.e.f. 22.11.2004, as per the order dated 01.07.2006 (Page-53).

5.2. That vide order dated 15.09.2016, the senior scale and selection grade of the petitioner was cancelled/rejected, d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top