IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Bhargav D. Karia, J.
Pandya Mehul Kishenbhai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
Special Civil Application No. 4680 of 2016
Decided On : 10-06-2022
Constitution of India – Articles 226, 227 – Power of High Courts to issue certain writs – Superintendence – Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India, petitioner has prayed for reliefs– Held, Petitioner was not appointed in post of Lecturer is also not tenable Government Resolution which provides that once petitioner is granted pay-scale of Lecturer his post of Assistant Lecturer would be converted into that of Lecturer – Aspect is also made clear by Commissioner of Technical Education in of his addressed to Principal Secretary Education Department which is produced on record along with affidavit taking consideration above aspects more particularly stand of Commissioner of Technical Education that Government Resolution applicable only to new recruitments – Petition allowed.
JUDGMENT :
(1.) Heard learned advocate Mr.K.B.Pujara for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr.K.M.Antani for the respondent No.1.
(2.) By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :
(b) PENDING the hearing and final disposal of this petition, be pleased to stay the operation of the impugned order dated 16-3-2016 passed by the respondent no.1, served to the petitioner on 21-3- 2016, as per Annexure -E;
(c) to grant any other appropriate and just relief/s including the costs of this petition;"
(3.) The brief facts of the case are as under :
3.2. By Government Resolution dated 9th November, 1981, the State Government decided to up-grade the post of Assistant Lecturers of the Polytechnics in the pay-scale of Lecturers if they are possessing the educational qualifications and experience as provided in the Rules of Recruitment for Lecturers, Gujarat Education Service, Class-II (Collegiate Branch).
3.3. Accordingly, the petitioner was up-graded in the pay-scale of Lecturer, Gujarat Education Service, Class-II vide order of the State Government dated 26th May, 2009 with effect from 5th September, 1992.
3.4. Thereafter, by order passed by the respondent No.2-Commissioner of Technical Education on 17th April, 2013, the petitioner was granted senior pay-scale of Rs.10000-325-15000 with effect from 5th September, 2000 and Selection Grade of Rs.12000-420-18300 with effect from 5th September, 2005. Under the 6th Pay Commission, the petitioner was placed in the corresponding Pay- Band of Rs.37400-67000 with Grade Pay of Rs.9,000/-.
3.5. The respondent No.1-State of Gujarat passed the impugned order dated 16th March, 2016 which was served upon the petitioner on 21st March, 2016 whereby, the order of up-gradation dated 26th May, 2009 is ordered to be cancelled and the petitioner is ordered to be reverted back to the earlier post of Assistant Lecturer.
3.6. The petitioner being aggrieved by the impugned order dated 16th March, 2016 has preferred this petition.
(4.) Learned advocate Mr.K.B.Pujara for the petitioner submitted that the impugned order is passed by violating the principles of natural justice as no opportunity of hearing was provided to the petitioner though the impugned order has serious civil consequences for the petitioner as the petitioner was to be down-graded to the lower post of Assistant Lecturer and his salary would be substantially reduced.
4.3. It was submitted that the impugned order also suffers from non-application of mind and gross arbitrariness in asmuch as the impugned order does not state as to why and how the petitioner is not satisfying the qualification of Lecturer, Class-II. Reliance was placed on the Government Resolution dated 9th November, 1981 which provides for up-gradation and placement of Assistant Lecturer of Polytechnics in the pay-scale of Lecturers if they are possessing the education qualification and experience as provided in the Rules of Recruitment for Lecturer, Gujarat Education Service, Class-II (Collegiate Branch).
4.4. It was submitted that the reference made in 1 AIR 1967 Supreme Court 1269 the impugned order with regard to the Government Resolution dated 07
The court established that changes in qualification requirements for promotion are valid and can affect an employee's eligibility for upgradation.
The cancellation of a senior scale and selection grade after significant delay and without prior communication of adverse remarks violates principles of natural justice.
The main legal point established is the entitlement of the petitioner to arrears from the correct date of completion of refresher courses as per UGC Regulations, 2000, and the finality of court order....
Lecturers appointed before January 1, 1996 are entitled to selection grade benefits without needing a Master’s degree, ensuring equal treatment in service matters.
The Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) is not applicable to the College of Accountancy and Management Studies (CAMS) due to its distinct staffing structure, and eligibility for promotion under the CAS r....
The denial of UGC scale of pay from the date of regularization based on unjust conditions is discriminatory, violating equal treatment under Article 14.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.