SUNITA AGARWAL, N. V. ANJARIA
Hardik Pradipbhai Joshi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. multiple appeals arise from a common judgment regarding employment status. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. resolutions based on expert study led to employment terminations due to the student-teacher ratio. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. affirms the dismissal of all appeals due to lack of merit. (Para 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT :
(N.V. Anjaria, J.)
These Letters Patent Appeals, fourteen in numbers, arise from common judgment and order dated 07.10.2022 of learned Single Judge dismissing the Special Civil Applications filed by the appellants-original petitioners.
1.1 Since the facts have common thread and the issues involved are identical, all the appeals were heard together to be disposed of simultaneously by this judgment.
2. Heard learned advocates Mr. Ekrama Kureshi, Mr. S.P. Majmudar and Mr. Ullash Gohil for the appellants appearing in the respective appeals, whereas learned Government Pleader Ms. Manisha L. Shah assisted by learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Siddharth Rami with learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Jeenal Acharya in all the appeals on behalf of the State and its authorities.
2.1 Letters Patent Appeal No. 1313 of 2012 was treated as main along with Letters Patent Appeals No. 1314 o
Dr. Chanchal Goyal vs. State of Rajasthan
J. & K. Public Service Commission and Ors. vs. Dr. Narinder Mohan and Ors.
Ad-hoc appointments do not confer a right to continue in service once regularly selected candidates become available, reinforcing employment law principles regarding temporary roles.
The court established that changes in qualification requirements for promotion are valid and can affect an employee's eligibility for upgradation.
Point of Law - There is no violation of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. As there is alternative efficacious remedy available to the petitioner to approach the Lobour Court for ....
The continuous advertisement of a reserved post for a specified period without a response from reserved category candidates entitles the appointed candidate to de-reservation and service benefits as ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for conducting regular selections for the post of Asstt. Professor in accordance with the UGC Regulations of 2010, and the emphasis....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.