Back
SUNITA AGARWAL, N. V. ANJARIA
Aryan Sandip Bihola – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to educational admission rules. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments against domicile-based exclusions in eligibility. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. judicial precedents supporting state regulations. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's affirmation of domicile reservation in admissions. (Para 18 , 20) |
| 5. petition dismissed based on established legal framework. (Para 24 , 26) |
JUDGMENT :
(Sunita Agarwal, CJ.)
1. The petitioner herein seeks to challenge the vires of Rules 4(3) and 4(6) of the Gujarat Professional Medical Educational Courses (Regulation of Admission in Undergraduate Courses) Rules, 2017, which has been framed by the State of Gujarat in exercise of powers conferred upon it by Sub-section (1) of Section 20 read with Section 4 of the Gujarat Professional Medical Educational Colleges or Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fees) Act, 2007.
2. The factual matrix of the claim of the petitioner as stated in the writ petition is that the petitioner belongs to Scheduled Tribe category born in the State of Gujarat in the city of Ahmedabad. His parents and grand parents were also born in the State of Gujarat. The father of the writ petitioner got employed in Canara Bank arou
Legitimate classification based on residency for admission into medical programs is constitutional, ensuring local residents benefit while maintaining educational standards contrary to claims of disc....
The court upheld residency-based admission criteria for medical college, affirming that such classification is rational and serves state interests, thus not violating constitutional provisions.
A young student should not feel that his entire industry to get himself qualified in the examination becomes meaningless because of some fault or dramatic design of certain authorities and they can g....
Reservation of postgraduate medical seats based on domicile is constitutional, supporting local education while respecting equality principles.
Domicile/residence-based reservation in PG Medical Courses is unconstitutional, violating the principle of equality under Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution.
The court declared rules creating residency-based reservation for medical admissions unconstitutional as they violate Article 14, ensuring equality before law prevails in educational opportunities.
The court reaffirmed that the rules governing eligibility for education should not unjustly exclude candidates based on residence due to circumstances beyond their control, particularly where a perma....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the minimum qualifying standard for MBBS and other professional courses is to be applied to all candidates of management seats and NRI seats, ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
