HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
SUNITA AGARWAL, CJ, PRANAV TRIVEDI, J.
Maushami Amulkumar Ganguly - Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat - Respondent
R/Special Civil Application No. 10449 of 2024
Decided On : 20-01-2025
(A) Gujarat Panchayat Services (Class-III), Departmental Examination Rules, 2022 - Rule 3(1) - Amendment by Rules, 2023 - Exemption from passing departmental examination for promotion to Female Health Supervisor Class-III challenged - Court held that exemption for those eligible as of 01.09.2022 does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution - Classification has rational basis and does not create class within a class. (Paras 20-22)
(B) Article 14 of the Constitution of India - Right to equality - Classification based on eligibility criteria under old rules is valid and does not offend equality provisions. (Paras 15-19)
Facts of the case:
Petitioners challenged the validity of the amended Rules exempting certain individuals from passing the departmental examination for promotion to Female Health Supervisor Class-III, arguing it created an unjust classification. The respondents were promoted based on the exemption clause.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the exemption clause had a rational basis and did not violate the right to equality, as it distinguished between those eligible under the old rules and those who were not.
Issues: Whether the exemption clause created an arbitrary classification violating Article 14 of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the classification based on eligibility under the old rules was reasonable and did not constitute an arbitrary classification.
Result: Writ petition dismissed. Parties involved: Petitioners and respondents No.3 to 7. Dissenting opinions: None.
JUDGMENT :
SUNITA AGARWAL, C.J.
1. The challenge in the present petition is to the provisions contained in the Rule 2(i) of the Gujarat Panchayat Services (Class-III), Departmental Examination (Second Amendment) Rules, 2023 (in short as ‘the Rules’ 2023’), whereby a proviso has been inserted in sub-rule (1) of Rule 3 of the Gujarat Panchayat Services (Class-III), Departmental Examination Rules, 2022 (in short as ‘the Departmental Examination Rules’ 2022) as under:-
“2. In the Gujarat Panchayat Services (Class-III), Departmental Examination Rules, 2022, (hereinafter referred to as “the said rules”), in rule-3,
(i) After sub-rule(1), the following proviso shall be inserted, namely:-
“Provided that the person who was eligible in all respect on the 1st September, 2022 for being promoted to the post mentioned in Part-II Appendix-A shall be exempted from passing the examination.”
2. The original Rules 3(1) and 4 of the Departmental Examination Rules’ 2022 is relevant to be extracted hereinunder:-
“3. Requirement to pass the examination
3(1) The person appointed to the post specified in Part-I of Appendix A shall be required to pass the Lower Level Departmental Examination to be eligible for promotion tot he respective post specified in Part-II of Appendix A.”
4. Eligibility to appear in the examination
(1) No person shall be eligible to appear in the examination unless he has completed two years’ of continuous service after his appointment on the post of Part-I of Appendix A and Appendix B.
(2) No person shall be eligible to appear in the examination unless he has passed the post-training examination to existing post or he has been exempted from passing post-training examination by the Competent authority, if any.
3. The grievance raised by the petitioners is about the exemption granted to the persons eligible in all respects as on 01.09.2022 from passing the departmental examination, for being promoted to the post of Female Health Supervisor Class-III, from Female Health Workers Class-III. While challenging the validity of the amended Rules inserting the exemption clause, the challenge has also been raised to the promotion of five incumbents (respondents No.3 to 7 herein) to the post of Female Health Supervisor (Class-III) vide order dated 29.06.2024, by giving benefit of the aforesaid exemption clause.
4. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that vide the Departmental Examination Rules’ 2022, notified on 23.08.2022, it became necessary for every incumbent working on the post of Female Health Worker Class-III to pass the Lower level departmental examination to be eligible for promotion to the post of Female Health Supervisor Class-III. Once the requirement of passing the departmental examination has been brought into the rules within the eligibility criteria for the purposes of promotion, there was no justification to exclude those who were otherwise eligible as on 01.09.2022, from the requirement of passing the departmental examination.
5. The contention is that as per the eligibility criteria, an incumbent working on the post of Female Health Worker Class-III is eligible to appear in the departmental examination, as per Rule 3 of the Departmental Examination Rules’ 2022, on completion of two years of continuous service after her appointment on the said post and completion of six months training and further passing of the post-training examination. The eligibility criteria, thus, for each incumbent working on the post of Female Health Worker Class-III is universal that (i) completion two years of continuous service after appointment on the said post; (ii) having passed, post-training examination to the existing post after completion of six months training.
6. However, the requirement of passing of Lower level departmental examination introduced with the Notification dated 23.08.2022 is in addition to the above noted eligibility criterias for promotion to the post of Female Health Supervisor Class-III. The submission is th
The exemption from passing the departmental examination for promotion based on eligibility as of 01.09.2022 does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution, as it is a reasonable classification.
The court ruled that the Gujarat Civil Services (Conditions of Service relating to Departmental Examination) Rules, 2015 are prospective and do not apply retrospectively to petitioners, who failed to....
The court ruled that the petitioner must comply with the new departmental examination rules for promotion, as the old rules do not apply retrospectively.
Exemption from departmental examination can be granted retrospectively; discrimination against similarly situated officers violates Article 14.
The court upheld the validity of amended promotion rules, ruling they apply prospectively and that participation in the selection process waives the right to challenge it.
when a new post is created, the concept of Rules obtaining when the vacancies arose is inappiicable as what is created is a new post on account of re-structuring of the cadre.
Eligibility for benefits under the ACP/MACP Scheme is conditional upon passing relevant departmental examinations, which is mandatory for promotion.
Classification based on educational qualifications for promotion in public service is valid if it promotes academic excellence and has a rational basis.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.