Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, NAVNEET KUMAR
Adhir Kumar Sinha, S/o Late Kamleshwari Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.:
Prayer:
1. The intra-court appeal, under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, is directed against order/judgment dated 30.07.2024 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 6006 of 2023 whereby and whereunder the prayer for quashing office order dated 02.04.2022, in which it has been mentioned that monetary benefit under ACP Scheme shall be given to the petitioner after passing of the final Accounts Examination i.e., on 25.08.2010, the date when the petitioner has passed the final Accounts Examination and further prayer for direction upon the respondents to upgrade the pay-scale of the petitioner under the ACP Scheme in pursuance to Circular dated 14.08.2002, has been refused to be interfered with by dismissing the writ petition.
Brief facts of the case:
2. Brief facts of the case, as per the pleadings made in the writ petition, which is required for adjudication of lis reads as under:
3. The petitioner has joined the services in forest department as Assistant on 01.12.1992 on compassionate ground in the pay-scale of Rs. 1200-1800 and retired from services on attaining the age of superannuation w.e.f. 31.01.2022 from the office of Divisional Forest Off
Eligibility for benefits under the ACP/MACP Scheme is conditional upon passing relevant departmental examinations, which is mandatory for promotion.
Passing the departmental accounts examination is not a condition precedent for grant of A.C.P. Rules under the Bihar State Employees Conditions of Service (Assured Career Progression Scheme)Rules, 20....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
