SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 163

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
VIPUL @ DANTO VELJIBHAI SHERAJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR CHINTAN S POPAT(5004) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER

HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent State.

2. The appellant has filed this Appeal under Section 14A of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for enlarging him on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11218006240859 of 2024 registered with Kirti Mandir Police Station, Porbandar, for the offences punishable under Sections 64(1) of BNS and Sections 3(2)(5) and 3(1)(w)(i) of the Atrocities Act.

3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence and now nothing is required to be recovered or discovered as the charge-sheet is filed. He has submitted that, due to quarrel took place between the victim and her husband, the victim left her matrimonial home and came into contact with the applicant and developed relationship. Further, the victim is major and applicant and victim were in love since last month and relationship was consensual in nature. In this regard FIR is filed. There is no proximate cause. Therefore, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top