SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 73

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
JADEJA BHAGYARAJSINH PRAVINSINH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR BM MANGUKIYA(437) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present successive application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “CrPC”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11191032240318 of 2024 registered with Maninagar Police Station, Ahmedabad City for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 294(b), 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “IPC”).

3. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence and now nothing is required to be recovered or discovered as the charge-sheet is filed. Further, applicant is aged 23 years whereas the complainant victim is aged 35 years. The allegation against the applicant is that under the false pretext of marriage, applicant developed physical relationship with the complainant and thereafter denied marrying her. He therefore submits that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application and requ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top