SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 375

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
IBRAHIM @ IBHLO KARIMBAHI KATHROTIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR YASH H JOSHI(6495) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Table of Content
1. bail application details (Para 2 , 6)
2. arguments for bail (Para 3 , 4)
3. considerations for bail (Para 5)
4. principle of bail jurisprudence (Para 7)
5. bail granted with conditions (Para 8 , 9 , 10)

ORDER :

2. Present appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as “Atrocity Act”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11208051240226 of 2024 registered with B Division Police Station, Rajkot for the offence under Sections 307, 323, 324, 294(b) and 114 the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “IPC”) / The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”) and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(2)(v) of the Atrocity Act and Section 135 of the GP Act.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State and learned advocate for the complainant have opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence and Therefore, the present appeal may be dismissed.

6. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following aspects have been considered:

(2) The investigation is over and charge-sheet is f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top