SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 230

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
JCD
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD – Appellant
Versus
VIRAJBHAI SURESHBHAI KANSARA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR PALAK H THAKKAR(3455) ,Respondent Advocate: MS PAURAMI B. SHETH(841)

ORDER :

1. The present First Appeal, under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, is preferred by the appellant – Insurance Company being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and award dated 18.03.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmedabad in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.937 of 2000. The claimants have filed cross-objections in the first appeal.

2. Brief facts of the case are as under:

2.1 On 07.09.2000, at about 3.00 hours, the claimant was going on his Kinetic Honda No.GJ-1-C-4002 near Gujarat College road and when he reached near the place of accident, one Scooter No.GJ-1-BR-8728 which was driven by its driver in rash and negligent manner and dashed with the vehicle of the claimant and thereby, the claimant received serious injuries.

3. Learned advocate for the appellant – Insurance Company has submitted that the Tribunal has committed an error as learned Tribunal has arrived at a finding that the driver of offending vehicle was not having driving licence and in spite of that learned Tribunal has held that appellant would be liable to pay compensation to the claimant and recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle. He would further submit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top