SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 403

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI, J
CHAUDHARI JAGDISHBHAI DEVJIBHAI – Appellant
Versus
DESAI JIVRAMBHAI VIHABHAI – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR TEJAS P SATTA(3149) ,Respondent Advocate: DELETED(20)

Table of Content
1. claimant's submissions on compensation (Para 3)
2. accident details and injuries (Para 4)
3. concept of just compensation (Para 5)
4. calculation of compensation (Para 6)
5. total compensation awarded (Para 7 , 8)

ORDER :

2. Brief facts of the case are as under:

3. Learned advocate for the appellant - claimant has submitted that the Tribunal has committed an error in not properly calculating the amount of compensation. He has submitted that amount of award is on lower side as the Tribunal has not properly considered the various aspects; like pain, shock and suffering, transportation, special diet, medical expenses etc. He would further submit that the learned Tribunal has taken Rs.1800/- as monthly income of the claimant. However, the claimant was engaged in the business of milk and also doing agricultural activities and for that 7/12 abstract has been produced on record. He would further submit that though the claimant has produced medical bills of Rs.92,781/-, the learned Tribunal has erred in not considering the same on the ground that the same are not exhibited.

4. As the insurance company was not represented by any advocate, on 14.10.2024, learned advocate Mr. Daksh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top