SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 368

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI, J
ZALUBHAI DIPABHAI RATHVA – Appellant
Versus
SANJAYBHAI RAMESHBHAI RATHVA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR A R DWIVEDI(11319) ,Respondent Advocate: RULE SERVED(64)

Table of Content
1. accident details and claim (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5)
2. arguments regarding insurance liability (Para 4)
3. discussion on driver's license (Para 6)
4. insurer's liability despite breach (Para 7)
5. court's directive to insurer (Para 8)

ORDER :

2. Brief facts of the case are as under :

3. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties.

5. Per contra, learned advocate Mr.Raval appearing for the other side referred to para 10.5 of the impugned judgment and award and would submit that Insurance Company has done all that it can do to prove that opponent No.1 was not holding valid and effective driving licence on the day of accident. He would submit that opponent No.1 was examined, as also RTO was also examined. Learned Tribunal has thoroughly discussed this issue to believe that since it is successfully established by the Insurance Company that driver of offending vehicle was not holding valid and effective driving licence, Insurance Company has established defense of breach of terms and conditions of the policy which has been rightly appreciated by the learned Tribunal. He would submit to dismiss this appeal.

7. While summing up the judgment, Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top