SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 304

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ILESH J. VORA, HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, JJ.
Rashmikant @ Jalio Satishbhai Parmar - Appellant 
Versus 
State of Gujarat and Another - Respondents 
Criminal Appeal (Against Conviction) No. 525 of 2014
Decided On : 20-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : P.P. Majmudar, Ashish M. Dagli
For the Respondent: Jay Mehta

The court upheld the conviction for murder based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, rejecting claims of false implication and communal riot.

Headnote:

(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 307, and 504 - Conviction appeal - Appellant convicted for murder and attempted murder - Evidence of eyewitnesses and medical reports established guilt - Conviction upheld despite claims of false implication and communal riot - Court found no merit in defense arguments. (Paras 1, 7, 21, 32)

(B) Evidence - Eyewitness testimony - The court emphasized the reliability of eyewitness accounts despite the absence of independent witnesses, affirming that the prosecution's case was not undermined by the non-examination of additional witnesses. (Paras 21, 22)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted for the murder of Jabir Shaikh and attempted murder of Irfan Shaikh, stemming from a dispute over a mobile phone. The incident occurred on 20.07.2011, where the appellant stabbed both victims, leading to Jabir's death. (Paras 3, 4)

Findings of Court:
The trial court found sufficient evidence, including eyewitness accounts and medical testimony, to convict the appellant for murder and attempted murder. (Paras 7, 32)

Issues: The main issues included the credibility of eyewitness testimony, the implications of non-examination of independent witnesses, and whether the act constituted murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder. (Paras 10, 26)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the evidence presented, particularly from eyewitnesses, was credible and sufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, rejecting the defense's claims of false implication and communal riot. (Paras 21, 32)

Result: Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld.

JUDGMENT :

(ILESH J. VORA, J.)

1. This conviction appeal is filed by the appellant –original accused, against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 07.03.2014, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Anand in Sessions Case no. 118 of 2011, wherein, the appellant - Rashmikant @ Jalio Satishbhai Parmar came to be tried for offences punishable under Sections 302, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’, for short).

2. At the end of the trial, the appellant came to be convicted and sentenced as tabulated hereunder:

Conviction under SectionSentence of imprisonmentFine
S.302 of IPCLife imprisonmentRs.25,000/-, in default to undergo three months simple imprisonment
S.307 of IPCSeven years rigorous imprisonmentRs.10,000/-, in default to undergo two months simple imprisonment
S.504 of IPCThree months simple imprisonmentRs.5000/-, in default to undergo one month simple imprisonment

3. Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of the present appeal are in nutshell as under:

3.1 The appellant – sole accused Rashmikant Satishbhai Parmar was charged for the murder of one Jabir Shaikh, resident of Village Borsad, Dist.: Anand. The incident took place on 20.07.2011 at about 07:30 p.m., near Mahakali Temple, Borsad. According to the case of the prosecution, the deceased Jabir Mohammad Shaikh was sitting near the area of common place and on seeing the deceased, the accused asked him to give his mobile which he had given to the accused and thereafter, the deceased requested the accused to give his mobile phone back. The accused got angry and took out the knife from his pocket and stabbed the deceased in left side of his chest causing serious injuries. It is further case of the prosecution that the cousin brother of the deceased Irfan Shaikh (PW:2), who came to rescue to the deceased, he was also stabbed by the accused on the right side of the chest with the same knife which allegedly used in causing the injuries to the deceased. After hue and cry, the complainant Ahemad Shaikh (PW:1) and others rushed to the scene of the offence where they saw the accused as well as deceased Jabir Shaikh and Irfan Shaikh. The deceased was taken to the local clinic Aashirwad Hospital, whereas the injured Irfan Shaikh taken to the Shriji Clinic, Borsad for treatment. The condition of the deceased was critical and therefore, he was referred to the higher centre at Karamsad Hospital where he succumbed to the injuries. The hospital authority informed the police and accordingly, PSI S.K. Mekwan was directed to reach at the hospital where after preliminary inquiry, the complaint was being disclosed by PW:1 Ahemad Shaikh, who happened to be the brother of the deceased. The offence was registered against the accused for the act of murder and causing injuries to the witness Irfan Shaikh. The investigation thereafter, entrusted to the PSI J.T. Rana (PW:19). The I.O., during the course of investigation, recorded the statement of eyewitnesses, drew the panchnama of place of occurrence and collected the blood samples for chemical analysis, arrested the accused, recovered the knife allegedly used in the offence, obtained the PM report and other medical case papers of the deceased as well as injured Irfan Shaikh, sent the seized articles to the FSL and obtained the report thereof. At the end of investigation, the chargesheet came to be filed against the accused before the Judicial Magistrate who committed the case to the Sessions Court, Anand.

4. After due framing of the charge and upon the accused pleaded not guilty, the trial commenced before the Additional Sessions Judge, Anand. In order to prove the charge, the prosecution has examined 19 witnesses and relied on the following exhibited documents:

Oral evidence

PW 1 – Exh.9Ahemad Mahmad Shafi Shaikh, complainant
PW2– Exh.11Irfan Shabbirhaji Shaikh, injured witness
PW 3–Exh.22Dr. Jayeshbhai Purshotambhai Vadher, medical officer
PW 4–Exh.26Dr. Hasmukhbhai Ambalal Pandya, medical officer
PW 5–Exh.28Dr. Pri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top