IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ILESH J. VORA, HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, JJ.
Rashmikant @ Jalio Satishbhai Parmar - Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat and Another - Respondents
Criminal Appeal (Against Conviction) No. 525 of 2014
Decided On : 20-03-2025
(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 307, and 504 - Conviction appeal - Appellant convicted for murder and attempted murder - Evidence of eyewitnesses and medical reports established guilt - Conviction upheld despite claims of false implication and communal riot - Court found no merit in defense arguments. (Paras 1, 7, 21, 32)
(B) Evidence - Eyewitness testimony - The court emphasized the reliability of eyewitness accounts despite the absence of independent witnesses, affirming that the prosecution's case was not undermined by the non-examination of additional witnesses. (Paras 21, 22)
Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted for the murder of Jabir Shaikh and attempted murder of Irfan Shaikh, stemming from a dispute over a mobile phone. The incident occurred on 20.07.2011, where the appellant stabbed both victims, leading to Jabir's death. (Paras 3, 4)
Findings of Court:
The trial court found sufficient evidence, including eyewitness accounts and medical testimony, to convict the appellant for murder and attempted murder. (Paras 7, 32)
Issues: The main issues included the credibility of eyewitness testimony, the implications of non-examination of independent witnesses, and whether the act constituted murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder. (Paras 10, 26)
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the evidence presented, particularly from eyewitnesses, was credible and sufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, rejecting the defense's claims of false implication and communal riot. (Paras 21, 32)
Result: Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld.
JUDGMENT :
(ILESH J. VORA, J.)
1. This conviction appeal is filed by the appellant –original accused, against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 07.03.2014, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Anand in Sessions Case no. 118 of 2011, wherein, the appellant - Rashmikant @ Jalio Satishbhai Parmar came to be tried for offences punishable under Sections 302, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’, for short).
2. At the end of the trial, the appellant came to be convicted and sentenced as tabulated hereunder:
| Conviction under Section | Sentence of imprisonment | Fine |
| S.302 of IPC | Life imprisonment | Rs.25,000/-, in default to undergo three months simple imprisonment |
| S.307 of IPC | Seven years rigorous imprisonment | Rs.10,000/-, in default to undergo two months simple imprisonment |
| S.504 of IPC | Three months simple imprisonment | Rs.5000/-, in default to undergo one month simple imprisonment |
3. Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of the present appeal are in nutshell as under:
3.1 The appellant – sole accused Rashmikant Satishbhai Parmar was charged for the murder of one Jabir Shaikh, resident of Village Borsad, Dist.: Anand. The incident took place on 20.07.2011 at about 07:30 p.m., near Mahakali Temple, Borsad. According to the case of the prosecution, the deceased Jabir Mohammad Shaikh was sitting near the area of common place and on seeing the deceased, the accused asked him to give his mobile which he had given to the accused and thereafter, the deceased requested the accused to give his mobile phone back. The accused got angry and took out the knife from his pocket and stabbed the deceased in left side of his chest causing serious injuries. It is further case of the prosecution that the cousin brother of the deceased Irfan Shaikh (PW:2), who came to rescue to the deceased, he was also stabbed by the accused on the right side of the chest with the same knife which allegedly used in causing the injuries to the deceased. After hue and cry, the complainant Ahemad Shaikh (PW:1) and others rushed to the scene of the offence where they saw the accused as well as deceased Jabir Shaikh and Irfan Shaikh. The deceased was taken to the local clinic Aashirwad Hospital, whereas the injured Irfan Shaikh taken to the Shriji Clinic, Borsad for treatment. The condition of the deceased was critical and therefore, he was referred to the higher centre at Karamsad Hospital where he succumbed to the injuries. The hospital authority informed the police and accordingly, PSI S.K. Mekwan was directed to reach at the hospital where after preliminary inquiry, the complaint was being disclosed by PW:1 Ahemad Shaikh, who happened to be the brother of the deceased. The offence was registered against the accused for the act of murder and causing injuries to the witness Irfan Shaikh. The investigation thereafter, entrusted to the PSI J.T. Rana (PW:19). The I.O., during the course of investigation, recorded the statement of eyewitnesses, drew the panchnama of place of occurrence and collected the blood samples for chemical analysis, arrested the accused, recovered the knife allegedly used in the offence, obtained the PM report and other medical case papers of the deceased as well as injured Irfan Shaikh, sent the seized articles to the FSL and obtained the report thereof. At the end of investigation, the chargesheet came to be filed against the accused before the Judicial Magistrate who committed the case to the Sessions Court, Anand.
4. After due framing of the charge and upon the accused pleaded not guilty, the trial commenced before the Additional Sessions Judge, Anand. In order to prove the charge, the prosecution has examined 19 witnesses and relied on the following exhibited documents:
Oral evidence
| PW 1 – Exh.9 | Ahemad Mahmad Shafi Shaikh, complainant |
| PW2– Exh.11 | Irfan Shabbirhaji Shaikh, injured witness |
| PW 3–Exh.22 | Dr. Jayeshbhai Purshotambhai Vadher, medical officer |
| PW 4–Exh.26 | Dr. Hasmukhbhai Ambalal Pandya, medical officer |
| PW 5–Exh.28 | Dr. Pri |
The court upheld the conviction for murder based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence, rejecting claims of false implication and communal riot.
The prosecution must establish the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt based on consistent and trustworthy evidence, including eyewitness testimony, medical evidence, and incriminating cir....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the evidence of eyewitnesses, the injured witness, and the medical evidence played a crucial role in establishing the guilt of the accused bey....
The testimony of injured witnesses is highly credible, and direct evidence can establish guilt without needing to prove motive.
Culpable homicide distinguished from murder based on intention and knowledge; knowledge suffices for conviction under Section 304(II) of IPC, while failure to explain accused injuries does not negate....
The court clarified the distinction between murder and culpable homicide, emphasizing that sudden altercations without premeditated intent can lower the charge under IPC.
Intention in culpable homicide is inferred from the nature of the weapon used, the location of injuries, and conduct indicating a purposeful act to achieve a harmful outcome.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.