SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 336

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 4871 of 2025 ==========================================================
RAJNEESH BABBAR, S/O GULSHAN KUMAR Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================
Appearance:
MR.ADITYA J PANDYA(6991) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR KANVA ANTANI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY Date : 20/03/2025

Petitioner Advocates:MR.ADITYA J PANDYA(6991) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

The court exercised discretion to grant bail under Section 483, emphasizing the nature of allegations and imposing conditions to ensure compliance and protect the investigation.

Headnote:(A) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023 - Section 483 - Application for regular bail - Applicant charged with supplying contraband charas worth 870 grams, captured on CCTV - Investigation complete, charge-sheet filed - Court finds it a fit case for bail considering nature of allegations. (Paras 2, 5, 7)

(B) Bail - Conditions imposed include not misusing liberty, not obstructing investigation, surrendering passport, and marking presence at police station - Court emphasizes that trial should not be influenced by preliminary observations made during bail hearing. (Paras 8, 11)

Facts of the case:
The applicant is accused of supplying contraband charas, with evidence from CCTV footage showing the transaction. The investigation is complete, and the charge-sheet has been filed.

Findings of Court:
The court finds it appropriate to grant bail, imposing conditions to ensure compliance and safeguard the investigation.

Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail considering the nature of the allegations and evidence against him.

Ratio Decidendi: The court exercised its discretion to grant bail, emphasizing that the nature of the allegations warranted such a decision without delving into detailed evidence at this stage.

Result: Application for bail allowed.

ORDER :

(M.R. MENGDEY, J.) 

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11195003240889 of 2024 registered with Amirgadh Police Station, Banaskantha.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the present applicant had supplied the stock of contraband charas worth 870 Grams to the other co- accused from whose conscious possession the same had been recovered. The exchange of the contraband substance has been captured in the C.C.T.V. footage of the mall wherein it has taken place. The applicant herein had travelled in his own car for supply of the said contraband substance and the car of the present applicant has also been captured in the C.C.T.V. footage. He, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. In present case, the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. As per the case of prosecution, the co-accused was found in conscious possession of contraband substance of Charas worth 870 Grams, which was an intermidiate quantity and the said stock of contraband substance had been supplied by the present applicant.

6. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in [2012]1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;

(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;

(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;

(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;

(f) furnish the present address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of Trial Court;

9. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

11. At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

12. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

Direct service is permitted.  

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top