SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 336

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
RAJNEESH BABBAR S/O GULSHAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR.ADITYA J PANDYA(6991) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(M.R. MENGDEY, J.) 

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11195003240889 of 2024 registered with Amirgadh Police Station, Banaskantha.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the present applicant had supplied the stock of contraband charas worth 870 Grams to the other co- accused from whose conscious possession the same had been recovered. The exchange of the contraband substance has been captured in the C.C.T.V. footage of the mall wherein it has taken place. The applicant herein had travelled in his own car for supply of the said contraband substance and the car of the present applicant has also been captured in the C.C.T.V. footage. He, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top