SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 944

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
SURAJKUAMR LAKSHMANKUMAR GOLADAS AAHIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR V B MALIK(5071) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11211058250068 of 2025 registered with Bajana Police Station, Surendranagar.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicants submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicants may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of regular bail, inter alia, contending that the present applicants had called for stock of contraband substance, which had been seized by the police authorities from the premises in question. She further submitted that the investigation of the offence is still in progress. She, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. As per the case of prosecution, the stock of contraband liquor worth Rs.7,91,600/- had been seized from the premises, wherein the present applicants were found present. It is the case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top