HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
SURAJKUAMR LAKSHMANKUMAR GOLADAS AAHIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.
2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11211058250068 of 2025 registered with Bajana Police Station, Surendranagar.
3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicants submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicants may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of regular bail, inter alia, contending that the present applicants had called for stock of contraband substance, which had been seized by the police authorities from the premises in question. She further submitted that the investigation of the offence is still in progress. She, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.
5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. As per the case of prosecution, the stock of contraband liquor worth Rs.7,91,600/- had been seized from the premises, wherein the present applicants were found present. It is the case
The court held that the absence of prior criminal records and the nature of allegations justified granting bail, emphasizing discretion in such cases.
The court granted regular bail under specific conditions, emphasizing the need to prevent misuse of liberty and ensure cooperation with ongoing investigations.
The court granted bail based on the completion of the investigation and the applicant's lack of prior criminal record, imposing conditions to ensure compliance.
The court granted bail based on the completion of the investigation and the nature of allegations, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent misuse of liberty.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's lack of prior offenses and the completion of the investigation, emphasizing the need for discretion in such matters.
The court exercised discretion to grant bail under Section 483, emphasizing the nature of allegations and imposing conditions to ensure compliance and protect the investigation.
The court granted regular bail based on the completion of investigation and the nature of allegations, imposing specific conditions to ensure compliance.
The court granted bail due to insufficient evidence connecting the applicant to the offence, emphasizing the need for substantial proof in bail applications.
The court granted bail based on the lack of trial progress and the applicant's custody duration, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent misuse of liberty.
Insufficient evidence connecting the applicant to the offence justified the granting of bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.