SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 895

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
ASIF @ BAVA AFAK AHMEED KHAN @ JAVED KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR GAJENDRA P BAGHEL(2968) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11210061240192 of 2024 registered with Lalgate Police Station, Surat.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the present applicant had supplied the stock of contraband substance of Mephedrone worth 1 kg to the other co-accused and had also collected money for the said purpose through the other co-accused. The present applicant was in constant touch with the other co-accused and there are several call details between the present applicant and the other co-accused. Moreover, there are financial transactions between the present applicant and other co-accused. He, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top