SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(UK) 56

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Pankaj Purohit, J
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Sangeeta Sah and others – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M.K. Goyal

Table of Content
1. accident caused by negligent driving leading to the claim. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. insurer's defense based on driver's invalid license and policy breach. (Para 5 , 6 , 10)
3. court's affirmation of insurer's liability despite driving license issues. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. compensation determined with future prospects included. (Para 11)
5. appeal dismissed, affirming tribunal's award and payment instructions. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant - Insurance Company under section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 challenging the judgment and award dated 02.09.2014 passed by the MACT/District judge, Nainital, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 38 of 2009. By the said award, a sum of Rs.9,50,200/- along with interest at the rate of 7% per annum has been granted in favour of the claimants for the death of Vikas Sah in a motor accident, fastening the liability upon the Insurance Company with liberty to recover the amount from the owner of the offending vehicle. The challenge in the present appeal, therefore, pertains to both the question of liability and the quantum of compensation awarded.

3. The claimants reiterated before

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top