SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 378

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HDS
SUMATBHAI KAJUBHAI MOHANIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:UMARFARUK M KHARADI(8155) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)

1. Present application is filed by the applicant seeking the following relief:

“(b) Allow this Application by quashing and setting aside the Impugned order dated 16.12.2024 (Annexure-A) passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge, Pocso, Dahod at Limkheda below Exhibit-64 in Special POCSO Case No. 24 of 2023, and further be pleased to allow application at exhibit-64 and original birth certificate may be ordered to be exhibited and admitted as evidence in the interest of justice;”

2. It is the case of the applicant that he is facing charges under the POCSO Act. To establish the age of the victim, the prosecution previously examined the then Talati-cum-Mantri, who referred to Exhibit 59—the date and extract of the birth register. However, he submitted that the record was not available and stated that he was awaiting a report from the Taluka Development Officer before requesting the exhibition of the said documents.

3. The learned APP objected, arguing that in the absence of proof of the contents of the said documents, they could not be exhibited, and the entry was not proven. Subsequently, the defense examined the Talati-cum-Mantri who was s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top