SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 792

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
VIJAY @ GOLU S/O MOHANBHAI MANGILAL PUROHIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR YASH B PATEL(12956) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.

2. This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for regular bail in connection with F.I.R. No.11191045250088 of 2025 registered with Sola High Court Police Station, District Ahmedabad.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that considering the nature of offence and role attributed to the applicant, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. The learned APP appearing for the respondent State has vehemently submitted that the applicant was working in the showroom of the cars and had siphoned away amount of Rs.6,91,000/-. Learned APP has, therefore, submitted that the offences which have been charged, are serious in nature and looking to the facts as well as the allegations levelled against the applicant, no discretion is required to be exercised.

5. Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties and perused the material available on record. As per the case of prosecution, the present applicant while working in the showroom of cars, had siphoned away Rs.6,91,000/-. Having regard to the nature of offence

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top