HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
SVP
JAYDEVSINH BAHADURSINH ZALA @ JAYUBHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard learned advocate Dr.Hiren S. Somaiya for the applicant and learned APP Ms. Jirga Jhaveri for the respondent – State.
2. By way of the present application, the applicant has prayed to grant leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 27.07.2024 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gondal in Criminal Case No.1535 of 2022.
3. Learned advocate Dr.Hiren S. Somaiya for the applicant submits that the applicant and the respondent No.2 have business relations and an amount of Rs.13,30,000/- wad due from the respondent No.2. On demanding the same, the respondent No.2 gave cheque No.002677 dated 24.03.2022 for an amount of Rs.11,00,000/- of his account with ICICI Bank, Mavdi Circle Branch. On depositing the said cheque by the applicant in his account with the Bank of Baroda, Mandvi Chowk Branch, the same has returned unpaid with the endorsement “Payment Stopped by Drawer”. The applicant had given the demand statutory notice to the respondent No.2, which was duly served and the amount was not repaid by the respondent No.2, hence, the applicant filed a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act before the Court of the Additiona
The trial court's failure to properly appreciate evidence can lead to a successful challenge against an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The court emphasized the necessity for proper appreciation of evidence and documents in cases involving cheque dishonor under Section 138 of the NI Act.
The statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must be applied in favor of the holder in due course unless effectively rebutted by the accused.
The presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must be drawn in favor of the holder unless rebutted, and misinterpretation of evidence by the Trial Court can lead to a successful....
The court found that the trial Court's failure to properly appreciate evidence justified granting leave to appeal against the acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
The presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must be drawn in favor of the holder of the cheque, and misinterpretation of evidence by the Trial Court warrants leave to appeal.
The trial court's failure to properly appreciate evidence led to the granting of leave to appeal against the acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The court emphasized the importance of proper evidence assessment in dishonor of cheque cases, ruling that the benefit of doubt must be rigorously applied.
Proper appreciation of evidence is essential in financial disputes; failure to do so warrants a review of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The court emphasized the necessity for the Trial Court to properly appreciate all evidence and documents, leading to the granting of leave to appeal against acquittal under Section 378(4) of the Code....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.