SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 482

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
S.V. PINTO, J
PATEL VISHNUBHAI CHHAGANLAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR.HEMANG H PARIKH(2628) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1. Heard learned advocate Mr.Rasesh H. Parikh for the applicant and learned APP Ms. Jirga Jhaveri for the respondent –State.

2. By way of the present application, the applicant has prayed to grant leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 05.02.2025 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patan in Criminal Case No.616 of 2020.

3. Learned advocate Mr.Rasesh H. Parikh for the applicant submits that the applicant is in the business of getting succession certificate of the shares and in connection with the above, the respondent No.2 had business transaction with the applicant, and thereafter, the relation developed between both the parties. The respondent No.2 wanted to send her daughter abroad and as the respondent No.2 demanded Rs.10,00,000/- from the applicant, the applicant gave Rs.5,00,000/- from the account of “Khushbu Consultancy” and another Rs.5,00,000/- from his own account on 12.09.2019. That an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- given from “Khushbu Consultancy” was returned by RTGS on 05.06.2020 and the amount given from the account of the applicant was not returned and on demanding the same, the respondent No.2 issued cheque No. 455855 dated 15

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top