HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
S.V. PINTO, J
PATEL VISHNUBHAI CHHAGANLAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard learned advocate Mr.Rasesh H. Parikh for the applicant and learned APP Ms. Jirga Jhaveri for the respondent –State.
2. By way of the present application, the applicant has prayed to grant leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 05.02.2025 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patan in Criminal Case No.616 of 2020.
3. Learned advocate Mr.Rasesh H. Parikh for the applicant submits that the applicant is in the business of getting succession certificate of the shares and in connection with the above, the respondent No.2 had business transaction with the applicant, and thereafter, the relation developed between both the parties. The respondent No.2 wanted to send her daughter abroad and as the respondent No.2 demanded Rs.10,00,000/- from the applicant, the applicant gave Rs.5,00,000/- from the account of “Khushbu Consultancy” and another Rs.5,00,000/- from his own account on 12.09.2019. That an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- given from “Khushbu Consultancy” was returned by RTGS on 05.06.2020 and the amount given from the account of the applicant was not returned and on demanding the same, the respondent No.2 issued cheque No. 455855 dated 15
The court emphasized the importance of proper evidence assessment in dishonor of cheque cases, ruling that the benefit of doubt must be rigorously applied.
The trial court's failure to properly appreciate evidence can lead to a successful challenge against an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The failure of the Trial Court to appreciate documentary evidence warrants reconsideration of the acquittal in a cheque dishonor case.
The court emphasized the necessity for proper appreciation of evidence and documents in cases involving cheque dishonor under Section 138 of the NI Act.
The court found that the trial Court's failure to properly appreciate evidence justified granting leave to appeal against the acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
The court emphasized the necessity for the Trial Court to properly appreciate all evidence and documents, leading to the granting of leave to appeal against acquittal under Section 378(4) of the Code....
The court emphasized the necessity for proper appreciation of evidence in cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, indicating that failure to do so can lead to reconsideration of ac....
The trial court's acquittal was unjustified due to improper appreciation of evidence and failure to challenge party involvement, warranting leave to appeal.
The trial court's failure to properly appreciate evidence led to the granting of leave to appeal against the acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The trial court's failure to properly appreciate evidence warrants reconsideration of the acquittal under Section 138 of the NI Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.