HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
SVP
TRUSHA TEA MARKETING PVT. LTD. THROUGH AKSHAY PRAVINBHAI SHAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Suraj B. Matieda for the applicant and learned APP Ms. Jirga Jhaveri for the respondent – State.
2. By way of the present application, the applicant has prayed to grant leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 05.02.2025 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patan in Criminal Case No.616 of 2020.
3. Learned advocate Mr. Suraj B. Matieda for the applicant submits that the applicant is manufacturer of tea and doing the business in the name and style of “Trusha Tea Marketing Pvt. Ltd.” and the respondent No.2 was the distributor of tea and had purchased tea goods to the tune of Rs.7,16,719/- from 01.04.2021 to 31.03.2022, and thereafter, to the tune of Rs.1,09,555/- from 01.04.2022 to 23.06.2022. When the account was settled, an amount of Rs.1,05,257/- was outstanding, towards which, the respondent No.2 issued cheque No.000267 dated from his account with ICICI Bank, Madhav Complex, Godhara Branch and on depositing the said cheque by the applicant in his account with The Kalupur Commercial Cooperative Bank Ltd., Sanand Branch, the same has returned unpaid with the endorsement “Account Closed”. The applicant had gi
The court emphasized the necessity for proper appreciation of evidence in cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, indicating that failure to do so can lead to reconsideration of ac....
Proper appreciation of evidence is essential in financial disputes; failure to do so warrants a review of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The trial court's failure to properly appreciate evidence can lead to a successful challenge against an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Differing evaluations of evidence by trial and appellate courts necessitate a review, justifying the granting of leave to appeal.
The court emphasized the importance of proper evidence assessment in dishonor of cheque cases, ruling that the benefit of doubt must be rigorously applied.
The trial court's acquittal was unjustified due to improper appreciation of evidence and failure to challenge party involvement, warranting leave to appeal.
The trial court's failure to properly appreciate evidence warrants reconsideration of the acquittal under Section 138 of the NI Act.
The court emphasized the necessity for proper appreciation of evidence and documents in cases involving cheque dishonor under Section 138 of the NI Act.
Leave to appeal granted as trial court dismissed the case without considering the applicant's submitted documents and presence in another court.
The court emphasized the necessity for the Trial Court to properly appreciate all evidence and documents, leading to the granting of leave to appeal against acquittal under Section 378(4) of the Code....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.