HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
GAURANANDAN @ BABULAL @ GOVARDHAN MALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
(M. R. MENGDEY, J.)
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State.
2. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11210046241258 of 2024 registered with Puna Police Station. Surat .
3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
5. Per contra, learned APP has vehemently opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that the applicant has several other antecedents for commission of similar nature of offences which indicates that as and when, the applicant is ordered to be enlarged on bail, he has a habit of commission of similar offences again and again. Learned APP therefore submitted that looking t
The court granted bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, emphasizing the need to consider the nature of the offence and the applicant's compliance with conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail considering the nature of the offence and the applicant's willingness to comply with conditions, emphasizing the balance between individual rights and public interest.
The court granted bail based on insufficient evidence linking the applicant to the crime, emphasizing the need for a prima facie case.
The court granted bail considering the nature of allegations, applicant's custody duration, and imposed conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's circumstances, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and ensure compliance with legal obligations.
The court established that bail may be granted when continued detention is unjustified, considering the nature of allegations and evidence presented.
The court granted bail under Section 483 of BNSS, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and ensure the applicant's presence at trial.
The court may grant bail after considering the gravity of the offense, the applicant's history of absconding, and the conditions necessary to ensure trial attendance.
The court emphasized that bail considerations involve evaluating the prima facie case, risk of flight, and potential tampering with evidence, allowing bail under strict conditions.
The court granted bail considering the nature of allegations, Applicants' custody duration, and compliance with bail conditions, emphasizing the importance of not tampering with evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.