SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 390

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
VIJAY BHUPATBHAI CHAVDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR. JAY M VANZARA(14122) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(M. R. MENGDEY, J.) 

1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State.

2. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11208002241013 of 2024 registered with Aji Dam Police Station. Rajkot City.

3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.

4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.

5. Per contra, learned APP has vehemently opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that the present applicant had actively participated in commission of the offence in question as the present applicant had assaulted the victim and had giving kicks and fists blows to him which had resulted into his death. Learned APP therefore submitted that looking to the natur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top