HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
SHAHNAWAJ @ SANU NIYAJ MAHAMMAD GULAMNABI @ DUDHI SHAIKH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
(M. R. MENGDEY, J.)
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent State.
2. The Applicants have filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the Applicants on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11204039240428 of 2024 registered with Mahudha Police Station. Kheda.
3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicants and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
4. Learned Advocate for the Applicants submitted that the Applicants have good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicants in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicants are ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
5. Per contra, learned APP has vehemently opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that the applicants were part of unlawful assembly which have committed the offence in question. The applicants herein have also damaged public property. Learned APP therefore submitted that looking to the nature and gravity of offence, this Court may not exercise the discretion i
The court granted bail considering the nature of allegations, Applicants' custody duration, and compliance with bail conditions, emphasizing the importance of not tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail based on insufficient evidence linking the applicant to the crime, emphasizing the need for a prima facie case.
The court granted bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, emphasizing the need to consider the nature of the offence and the applicant's compliance with conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail considering the nature of the offence and the applicant's willingness to comply with conditions, emphasizing the balance between individual rights and public interest.
The court granted bail considering the nature of allegations, applicant's custody duration, and imposed conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's circumstances, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and ensure compliance with legal obligations.
The court granted bail under Section 483 of BNSS, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and ensure the applicant's presence at trial.
The court granted bail considering the applicant's age and the nature of allegations, emphasizing the need for careful evaluation of bail conditions.
The court established that bail may be granted when continued detention is unjustified, considering the nature of allegations and evidence presented.
The court may grant bail after considering the gravity of the offense, the applicant's history of absconding, and the conditions necessary to ensure trial attendance.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.