SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 513

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL -
AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 151 of 2025 ==========================================================
ASIM NIZAMMIYA SHAIKH Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. KISHAN H DAIYA(6929) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR. HARDIK S. SONI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY Date : 11/03/2025

Petitioner Advocates:MR. KISHAN H DAIYA(6929) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

The court granted bail based on the Applicant's circumstances, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent witness tampering and maintain law and order.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 - Application for regular bail - The Applicant, arrested on 12.10.2023, sought bail citing good reputation and willingness to comply with conditions - The prosecution opposed bail, citing involvement in gang activities and threats to witnesses - The court considered factors including the nature of allegations and the Applicant's custody duration. (Paras 1-6)

(B) Bail considerations - The court emphasized three factors: prima facie case, availability of the accused at trial, and risk of witness tampering - The court allowed bail, imposing conditions to ensure compliance and maintain law and order. (Paras 5-6)

Findings of Court:
The Application for bail is allowed, with the Applicant to be released on a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- and conditions set forth.

Issues: The main issues were the Applicant's involvement in criminal activities and the appropriateness of granting bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Applicant's continued custody was not justified given the circumstances and the nature of the allegations, allowing bail with strict conditions.

Result: Application for bail allowed.

ORDER :

(M. R. MENGDEY, J.)

1. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11822004230687 of 2023 registered with Khergam Police Station, Navsari.

2. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.

Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the Respondent - State.

3. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.

4. Per contra, learned APP has opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that the Applicant was a leader of the gang which is involved in an unlawful activities. The Applicant herein had played an active role in commission of the offence in question. The Applicant and the other co- accused, with an intention to have their command over the area, had threatened the first informant and the other witnesses of dire consequences. The Applicant herein is also involved in several other criminal activities and several other offences have been registered against the present Applicant. Learned APP has therefore submitted that looking to the nature of offence, this Court may not exercise the discretion in favour of the applicant and the Application may be dismissed.

5. Heard learned Advocates for the parties and perused the record. The investigation is over and charge sheet is filed. The Applicant has been arrested in connection with the present offence on 12.10.2023 and since then the Applicant is in the custody. The trial of the offence as informed has not yet commenced. The other co-accused who are similarly situated to the present Applicant have been considered for grant of bail. Considering these aspects, the Application deserves consideration. This court has also considered the following aspects:

(a) As per catena of decisions of Hon’ble Supreme Court, there are mainly 3 factors which are required to be considered by this court i.e. prima facie case, availability of Applicant accused at the time of trial and tampering and hampering with the witnesses by the accused.

(b) That the learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant Accused is not likely to flee away.

(c) That the Applicant is in custody since 12.10.2023.

(d) The law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. C.B.I. Reported in (2012) 1 SCC 40.

6. Having heard the learned Advocates for the parties and perusing the record produced in this case as well as taking into consideration the facts of the case, nature of allegations, gravity of accusation, availability of the Applicant Accused at the time of Trial etc. and the role attributed to the present Applicant accused, the present Application deserves to be allowed and accordingly stands allowed. This Court has also gone through the FIR and police papers and also the earlier order passed by the learned Sessions Court where the learned Sessions Judge has disallowed the bail Application at initial stage. The Applicant Accused is ordered to be released on bail in connection with the aforesaid FIR on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, subject to the following conditions that he shall:

(a) not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence.

(b) maintain law and order and not to indulge in any criminal activities.

(c) furnish the documentary proof of complete, correct and present address of residence to the Investigati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top