Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY, J
KARA DEVRAJ RADA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent-State.
2. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11203004240546 of 2024 registered with ‘C’ Division Junagadh Police Station. Junagadh.
3. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
4. Learned Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the Applicant has good reputation in the society and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in jail for indefinite period. It is further contended that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by this Court if released on bail.
5. Per contra, learned APP has vehemently opposed the present application for grant of regular bail contending that the investigation of the offence is still in progress. The present applicant is a hard-core criminal and there are as many as 107 antecedents against the present applicant, therefore the provisions of GUJCTOC has been invoked against him. The investigating agency had sought an extens
The court granted bail under BNSS Section 483, emphasizing the need for strict conditions due to the Applicant's criminal history and the nature of allegations.
The court granted bail despite the applicant's criminal history, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of the nature of allegations and the applicant's compliance with conditions.
The court granted bail based on the applicant's good reputation, the nature of allegations, and compliance with specific conditions, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of bail factors.
The court granted bail considering the applicant's prolonged custody and the nature of allegations, imposing conditions to ensure compliance and prevent tampering with evidence.
The court emphasized that insufficient evidence of direct involvement and the applicant's good reputation justified granting bail under Section 483 of the BNSS.
The court ruled that the absence of material evidence linking the applicant to the alleged offence warranted the granting of bail, emphasizing the need for a prima facie case.
The court granted bail based on the Applicant's reputation and the completion of the investigation, imposing conditions to prevent tampering and ensure compliance.
The court granted bail under BNSS Section 483, emphasizing the need to consider the prima facie case, custody duration, and potential flight risk, while imposing strict conditions to ensure complianc....
The court granted bail based on the applicant's compliance with conditions and the nature of the allegations, emphasizing the importance of the relationship history and the status of the investigatio....
The court established that an applicant's good reputation and the nature of allegations can justify bail, subject to conditions to prevent tampering and ensure compliance.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
