HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
M. R. MENGDEY, J
KUNAL HARESHKUMAR JETHWANI – Appellant
Versus
MANDEEP SIWACH – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the Respondent-State.
2. The Applicant has filed this Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for enlarging the Applicant on Regular Bail in connection with File No.DGGI/AZU/GR.C/12(4)21/2024-25 at Ahmedabad under the provisions of Central Goods and Service Tax Act.
3. Heard learned senior Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent – State.
4. Learned senior Advocate for the Applicant has submitted that the applicant herein is alleged to have evade the benefit of Input Tax Credit to the tune of Rs.20,33,35,303/-, against the said amount, the amount of Rs.9,92,05,920/- had already been deposited. The amount of Rs.1,03,00,000/- had been seized in cash by the concerned authorities and the applicant had moved the concerned authorities to give credit of the said amount against the amount to be recovered from the present applicant. Moreover, the applicant is having Demand Draft for the amount of Rs.7,35,02,480/- ready with him which shall be deposited before this court during the course of the day.
4.1 The other co-accused namely Ravi Jayantilal Patel is the partner of th
The court granted bail, emphasizing the applicant's readiness to deposit amounts and absence of flight risk, while imposing strict conditions to ensure compliance.
The court granted bail under specific conditions, emphasizing the need for compliance and the importance of maintaining trial integrity.
The court granted bail due to the completion of the investigation, lack of necessity for the applicant's presence, and no imminent trial, emphasizing the need to consider the nature of allegations ag....
The court may grant bail after considering the gravity of the offense, the applicant's history of absconding, and the conditions necessary to ensure trial attendance.
The court ruled that prolonged incarceration without trial progress warrants bail, emphasizing the importance of timely justice.
The court granted bail considering the nature of the offence and the applicant's willingness to comply with conditions, emphasizing the balance between individual rights and public interest.
The court granted bail under Section 483 of BNSS, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent tampering with evidence and ensure the applicant's presence at trial.
The court established that bail can be granted by considering the nature of allegations, the applicant's reputation, and compliance with specific conditions to ensure trial integrity.
The court granted bail considering the nature of allegations, applicant's custody duration, and imposed conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, emphasizing the need to consider the nature of the offence and the applicant's compliance with conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.