SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 597

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
APM
BHAUMIKKUMAR KANUBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:CHIRAG A PRAJAPATI(8468) ,Respondent Advocate: GOVERNMENT PLEADER(1)

ORDER :

1. Learned counsel Mr. Rituraj Meena is permitted to file his Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent No.2.

2. RULE. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.1 and learned counsel Mr. Rituraj Meena for respondent No.2 waive service of notice of Rule.

3. By the present Special Civil Application, the petitioner impugns the order dated 1.1.2025 passed by the Registrar, Birth & Death, Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation whereby the application for change of date of birth of the petitioner from 4.6.1985 to 4.6.1984 has been rejected.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has produced various documents to show that the correct date of birth is 4.6.1984, however the respondent No.2 the learned Registrar has held that the date noted in the birth register in respect of the petitioner is correct since the same was intimated and registered by the elder person of the petitioner’s family. Learned counsel submits that the in support his date of birth, the petitioner has submitted Aadhar Card, PAN card, school leaving certificate and passport. She submits that the said documents ought to have been taken into consideration and the date of birth of the peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top