SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 620

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
JCD
ABDUL OSMAN NAREJA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:DARSHAN M VARANDANI(7357) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(J.C. DOSHI, J.)

Learned advocates for the petitioners do not press for this petition insofar as the offence punishable under the IPC. Permission as prayed for is granted. Thus, these petitions are confined to the offence punishable under the Atrocities Act.

2. By way of these petitions, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners have prayed for quashment of the FIR being C.R. No. II-59 of 2019 registered with Adesar Police Station against the applicants for the offences punishable under Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(5)(a) of The Scheduled Castes And The Scheduled Tribes (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

3. The short facts of the case as emerging from the FIR are that since the complainant was doing job of cultivating the crop in the agriculture field, the present accused persons asked him to vacate the said premises and field and not to do this work; to which complainant informed that he was doing this job since long years and thus the accused persons got excited and gave threat to kill him and thereby committed the aforesaid offence which has resulted into lodgment of the FIR.

4. Heard learned advocate for the petitioners and learned advocate for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top