Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.C.DOSHI
Lada Alias Dadho Ali Mohammed Khara – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for quashing fir under atrocities act (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding lack of ingredients in fir (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's examination of fir allegations (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal precedents regarding public view and insult under sc st act (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. conditions for quashing fir and legal principles (Para 12) |
| 6. order allowing the petition and quashing fir (Para 13 , 14) |
ORDER : J. C. DOSHI, J.
1.At the outset, it is required to be noted that, present petitioners have not pressed for this application insofar as the offence punishable under the IPC. Thus, this application is confined to the offence punishable under the Atrocities Act.
2. By way of this petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners have prayed for quashment of the FIR being C.R. No. II - 3001 of 2017 registered with Dudhai Police Station against the petitioners for the offences punishable under the provisions of the Scheduled Castes And The Scheduled Tribes (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
3. Heard learned advocate for the petitioners and learned APP for the respondent – State.
4. Though served, none appears for the private respondent/s.
5. Learned A
The absence of essential ingredients in the FIR, specifically public view and caste-based derogation, warrants quashing of the proceedings under the Atrocities Act.
The FIR did not disclose any offence under the Atrocities Act as it lacked necessary ingredients, leading to its quashment.
The FIR did not disclose sufficient grounds for offences under the Atrocities Act, lacking essential elements such as derogatory remarks and public view.
The FIR lacked necessary elements to constitute an offence under the Atrocities Act, as no derogatory remarks or public view were established.
The FIR was quashed as it failed to disclose essential elements of an offence under the Atrocities Act, including specific derogatory remarks and the context of public view.
FIR lacks necessary allegations to establish offences under the Atrocities Act, failing to meet legal requirements of public view and specific derogatory remarks.
An FIR under the Atrocities Act is quashed when it lacks essential ingredients necessary to constitute an offence, specifically failing to demonstrate remarks made in public view.
To constitute an offence under the Atrocities Act, accusations must demonstrate derogatory terms or insults made in public view, which were absent in the present case.
To establish an offence under the Atrocities Act, allegations must clearly demonstrate derogatory language used in public view, which was not present in this case.
The court held that an FIR alleging offences under the Atrocities Act must disclose specific derogatory remarks made in public view, which was not established in this case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
