SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 1063

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
J. C. DOSHI, J
Jayantibhai Maganbhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : A R KADRI
For the Respondent: MR SOHAM JOSHI

ORDER

Learned advocate for the petitioner does not press for this petition qua offence punishable under Sections 143, 147, 149, 323, 506(2) of Indian Penal Code lodged pursuant to FIR vide C.R. No. 11209014201172 of 2020 registered with Gambhoi Police Station Accordingly, petition stands disposed of as not pressed qua the aforesaid charges.

2. Heard learned advocate for the petitioners and learned APP for the respondent – State. Though served, respondent no.2 has not appeared.

3. Learned Advocate for the petitioners taking to the FIR would submit that general allegations are made against the petitioners and no such ingredients of the alleged offence is attracted if the FIR is read at its face value. In regards to the allegations made under the Atrocities Act, learned advocate for the petitioner would submit that FIR does not disclose the fact that any derogatory words was used by the petitioner to lower the caste of the first informant. Learned advocate for the petitioner would submit that if the FIR is read as it is no such ingredients of the alleged offence is found prima facie to have been attracted qua the petitioner and therefore by making above submissions, he would submit to al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top