SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 630

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
DHARMSHI @ LALO TARSHI KOLI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:KRUNAL S MEHTA(9227) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(M.R. MENGDEY, J.)

1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.

2. This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for regular bail in connection with F.I.R. No.11993017240196 of 2024 registered with Gagodar Police Station, District Katchh (East) Gandhidham.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that considering the nature of offence and role attributed to the applicant, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. The learned APP appearing for the respondent State has vehemently submitted that the age of the prosecutrix was below 18 years at the relevant time. Therefore, her consent would be immaterial. Learned APP has, therefore, submitted that the offences which have been charged, are serious in nature and looking to the facts as well as the allegations levelled against the applicant, no discretion is required to be exercised.

5. On 12th February, 2025, pursuant to the service of notice, the original complainant was present before the Court and had prayed for some time to engage an advocate through the High Court Legal Services Committee and thereaft

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top