SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 536

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MRM
CHANDANSING PIRSING DAHIYA (RAJPUT) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR ARJUNSINGH B CHAUHAN(11510) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

(M. R. MENGDEY, J.)

1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent-State.

2. This application is filed under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 for regular bail in connection with F.I.R. No.11210064230904 of 2023 registered with Godadara Police Station, District Surat.

3. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that considering the nature of offence and role attributed to the applicant, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. The learned APP appearing for the respondent State has vehemently submitted that the age of the prosecutrix was below 18 years at the relevant time. Therefore, her consent would be immaterial. Learned APP has, therefore, submitted that the offences which have been charged, are serious in nature and looking to the facts as well as the allegations levelled against the applicant, no discretion is required to be exercised.

5. Learned advocate appearing for the original complainant has also submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the complainant has no objection, if the applicant is ordered to be enlarged on bail. He has also produce

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top