SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 938

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 497 of 2025 ==========================================================
GHANSHYAM DHARMESHBHAI DABGAR Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. RAJKUMAR N DAVE(14054) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS UNNATI V PAREKH(12781) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR. DEVENDRA G RANA(6997) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MS DIVYANGNA JHALA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY Date : 21/03/2025

Petitioner Advocates:MS UNNATI V PAREKH(12781) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

The court granted bail considering the prosecutrix's consent and the nature of the allegations, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent misuse of liberty.

Headnote:(A) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023 - Section 483 - Application for regular bail - The applicant sought bail in connection with a FIR for an offence involving a prosecutrix aged below 18 years - The court considered the nature of the allegations and the prosecutrix's consent in the context of a love affair - The court allowed the bail application with specific conditions imposed. (Paras 2, 6, 8, 9)

(B) Bail - Conditions - The applicant was granted bail subject to conditions to ensure compliance with the law and to prevent misuse of liberty. (Paras 9, 10)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was accused in a case involving a prosecutrix who was 14 years and 7 months old at the time of the incident, which was described as consensual in nature. The investigation was complete, and a charge-sheet had been filed.

Findings of Court:
The court found it appropriate to exercise discretion in granting bail, emphasizing the need for conditions to safeguard the prosecution's interests.

Issues: The main issues included the age of the prosecutrix and the nature of the relationship between the applicant and the prosecutrix.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the circumstances warranted bail, considering the prosecutrix's consent and the nature of the allegations, while emphasizing that the trial court should not be influenced by preliminary observations made during the bail hearing.

Result: The present application is allowed.

ORDER :

1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11204026240390 of 2024 registered with Kapadwanj Town Police Station, Kheda.

3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the age of the prosecutrix was below 18 years at the relevant time. Moreover, she has narrated the incident, as it happened in her statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS. She, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.

5. Learned advocate for the original complainant has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that having regard to the age of prosecutrix and the manner in which the incident had taken place, the present application should be dismissed.

6. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. In present case, the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. Upon perusal of statement of the prosecutrix recorded during the course of investigation, it appears that she was having a love affair with the present applicant and because of the same, she had accompanied the present applicant on her own volition and the physical relations were also established between them with her consent of the prosecutrix, who was aged about 14 years and 7 months at the relevant time.

7. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

9. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;

(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;

(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;

(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;

(f) furnish the present address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of Trial Court;

(g) shall not enter the area of Kapadwanj Town Police Station for the period of six months except for the purpose of marking presence before the concerned Police Station and attending the trial proceedings.

10. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

11. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

12. At the trial, the trial C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top