IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 497 of 2025 ==========================================================
GHANSHYAM DHARMESHBHAI DABGAR Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. RAJKUMAR N DAVE(14054) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS UNNATI V PAREKH(12781) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR. DEVENDRA G RANA(6997) for the Respondent(s) No. 2 MS DIVYANGNA JHALA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY Date : 21/03/2025
ORDER :
1. RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.
2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhit, 2023, for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R.NO. 11204026240390 of 2024 registered with Kapadwanj Town Police Station, Kheda.
3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.
4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that the age of the prosecutrix was below 18 years at the relevant time. Moreover, she has narrated the incident, as it happened in her statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS. She, therefore, submitted to dismiss the present application.
5. Learned advocate for the original complainant has opposed the present application, inter alia, contending that having regard to the age of prosecutrix and the manner in which the incident had taken place, the present application should be dismissed.
6. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. In present case, the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. Upon perusal of statement of the prosecutrix recorded during the course of investigation, it appears that she was having a love affair with the present applicant and because of the same, she had accompanied the present applicant on her own volition and the physical relations were also established between them with her consent of the prosecutrix, who was aged about 14 years and 7 months at the relevant time.
7. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation, reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.
8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.
9. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;
(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;
(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;
(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;
(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;
(f) furnish the present address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of Trial Court;
(g) shall not enter the area of Kapadwanj Town Police Station for the period of six months except for the purpose of marking presence before the concerned Police Station and attending the trial proceedings.
10. The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.
11. Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.
12. At the trial, the trial C
The court granted bail considering the prosecutrix's consent and the nature of the allegations, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent misuse of liberty.
The court granted bail based on the nature of allegations and the prosecutrix's relationship with the applicant, emphasizing that consent is immaterial due to her age.
The court granted bail based on the prosecutrix's consent and the circumstances of the case, emphasizing the need for careful consideration in cases involving minors.
The court granted bail based on the completion of the investigation and the nature of the allegations, emphasizing the immateriality of the prosecutrix's consent due to her age.
The court granted bail based on the prosecutrix's admission of consensual relations, emphasizing that age-related consent issues are critical in such cases.
The court granted bail under Section 483, emphasizing the importance of conditions to prevent misuse of liberty in cases involving minors.
The court granted bail based on the consensual nature of the relationship between the applicant and the minor victim, emphasizing the need for discretion in such cases.
The court ruled that the prosecutrix's age below 18 years rendered her consent immaterial, justifying the grant of bail under specific conditions.
The court granted bail considering the applicant's custody duration, the nature of allegations, and the prosecutrix's age, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent tampering with evidence.
The court granted bail based on the nature of allegations, the Applicant's compliance with conditions, and the absence of physical relations with the prosecutrix.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.