SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 687

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
RAJESHBHAI LAKHABHAI SODHIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR. KISHAN H DAIYA(6929) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent – State of Gujarat.

1. By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11189003242047 of 2024 registered with 'A' Division Police Station, Morbi City for the offences punishable under Sections 386, 506(2) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sections 40 and 42 of the Gujarat Money Lenders Act.

2. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant has nothing to do with the offence and the applicant is falsely enroped in the offence. The allegation is that the complainant borrowed Rs.2 lakh from accused No.2 at the say of accused No.1 pursuant to which complainant paid in total Rs.22 lakh to the accused persons and the accused persons forcibly got executed agreement to sell from the complainant in connection with his land situated at Manekwada village and also taken two blank cheques of the complainant and in this regard complaint is filed. The complainant himself appear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top