SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 791

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL) NO.
5196 of 2025 ==========================================================
BHUPENDRABHAI @ PRAMOD BHARATBHAI PANCHAL Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MUNJAL V ACHARYA(10678) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR HK PATEL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR Date : 20/03/2025

Petitioner Advocates:MR MUNJAL V ACHARYA(10678) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Anticipatory bail granted based on applicant's cooperation with investigation and absence of prior criminal record, emphasizing judicial discretion in bail matters.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 482 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Section 316(2) - Anticipatory bail application - Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in connection with FIR for an offence not punishable with life imprisonment - Factors for consideration include nature of accusation, antecedents of applicant, and possibility of fleeing from justice - Applicant has cooperated with investigation and has no past criminal record. (Paras 1.0, 4.0, 5.0)

(B) Bail - Principles governing anticipatory bail - Court must exercise discretion judiciously, considering the gravity of the accusation and the applicant's cooperation with the investigation - The court emphasized that an order of anticipatory bail does not limit police investigation rights. (Paras 4.0, 6.0)

Facts of the case:
The applicant seeks anticipatory bail for an FIR registered for an offence under Section 316(2) of the BNS. The applicant has cooperated with the investigation and has no prior criminal history.

Findings of Court:
The application for anticipatory bail is allowed, with conditions set for cooperation with the investigation and presence at the police station.

Issues: The main issues addressed include the necessity of custodial interrogation and the applicant's cooperation with the investigation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the applicant's cooperation and lack of prior criminal record justified the grant of anticipatory bail, emphasizing the need for judicious discretion in such matters.

Result: Application allowed.

ORDER :

(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)

RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent – State of Gujarat.

[1.0] By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11204006240195 of 2024 registered with Antarsumba Police Station, District Kheda for the offence punishable under Section 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS”).

[2.0] Learned advocate for the applicant submits that pursuant to the order dated 12.03.2025 passed by this Court, the applicant has joined the investigation and even he is ready and willing to join the further investigation, if required. Hence, now nothing remains to be recovered or discovered from the present applicant and therefore, custodial interrogation at this stage is not necessary. Even, the applicant is not having any past antecedent. Besides, the applicant is available during the course of investigation and will not flee from justice. In view of the above, the applicant may be granted anticipatory bail.

[3.0] Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent – State has opposed grant of anticipatory bail and has requested to dismiss the present application.

[4.0] Having heard the learned advocate for the parties and perusing the investigation papers, it is equally incumbent upon the Court to exercise its discretion judiciously, cautiously and strictly in compliance with the basic principles laid down in a plethora of decisions of the Hon’ble Apex Court on the point. It is well settled that, among other circumstances, the factors to be borne in mind while considering an application for bail are (i) the nature and gravity of the accusation; (ii) the antecedents of the applicant including the fact as to whether he has previously undergone imprisonment on conviction by a Court in respect of any cognizable offence; (iii) the possibility of the applicant to flee from justice; and (iv) where the accusation has been made with the object of injuring or humiliating the applicant by having him so arrested. Though at the stage of granting bail an elaborate examination of evidence and detailed reasons touching the merit of the case, which may prejudice the accused, should be avoided. I have considered the following aspects.

(1) Offence is not punishable with life imprisonment or death penalty and are punishable with imprisonment upto 7 years;

(2) Applicant has joined the investigation and even he is ready to join further investigation;

(3) No case for custodial interrogation is made out;

(4) Even considering the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the cases of Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar reported in (2014)8 SCC 273; Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. reported in (2022)10 SCC 51 and Md. Asfak Alam vs. State of Jharkhand and Another reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 892.

[5.0] Considering the aforesaid aspects and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Asha Dubey vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh rendered in Criminal Appeal No.4564 of 2024 as well as in the case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. reported in (2011) 1 SCC 6941 wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court reiterated the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in the case of Shri Gurubaksh Singh Sibbia & Ors. reported in (1980) 2 SCC 665 and also the decision in the case of Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) reported in (2020) 5 SCC 1, I am inclined to allow the present application.

[6.0] In the result, the present application is allowed by directing that in the event of arrest / appearance of the applicant in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11204006240195 of 2024 registered with Antarsumba Police Station, District Kheda, the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top